by Hallu » Tue 03 Sep, 2013 12:08 pm
The thing is conservation is not very popular in Australia. In the US their national parks are sacred, and for centuries they had strong political figures who were conservationists at heart, including 3 presidents (Theodore Roosevelt, FDR, and even Jimmy Carter who saved the Alaskan wilderness). Apart from Bob Brown, there hasn't been one in Australia, one that could really influence the whole conservation idea in the country. In the US, they also have the Sierra Club, very influential and popular. And most of all, the public is behind their parks : hands off is the motto over here. In Australia it's more like "you want to make super tankers go through the great barrier reef ? Sure, fine, go ahead" or "you want one of the biggest uranium mines in the world in the heart of Kakadu, one of the most precious biospheres on Earth ? No worries." and that's really heart-breaking (and still you hear of political dirt-bags who call our parks "locked-up" so that no more should be created...). Tasmania seems the only state where there is a powerful environmental opposition to industrialists. All the other states either turn a blind eye or just go for it.