Gusto wrote:As for the idea of a Golite pack. That simply will not last anywhere near as long as the other packs mentioned. It's not worth considering if you are choosing between the others.
Gusto wrote:The WE Mountain Expedition is a good pack too. It's very similar to the lost world in design. It's main differences is that it uses a lighter wight nylon and has a side zipper. It also happens to be much cheaper in cost (I think it's about $200 cheaper.) The harness is almost the same. I believe the face fabric is a mesh instead of canvas. It is intentionally designed for alpine usage so it's lifespan is probably shorter than that of the Lost World if you are using it in the bush more.
Robert H wrote:Mutley wrote:I have owned a Macmillan for a few years. [...] The bottom pack access is good in theory but I have not really used it.
Sounds like you own a Strezlecki, as the McMillan does not have a bottom opening.
The McMilan is also slightly larger (+5L), has crampon attachments and a useful bungee system on the front. In my eyes the McMilan is the better pack of the two.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 96 guests