Backpack Conundrums

Bushwalking gear and paraphernalia. Electronic gadget topics (inc. GPS, PLB, chargers) belong in the 'Techno Babble' sub-forum.
Forum rules
TIP: The online Bushwalk Inventory System can help bushwalkers with a variety of bushwalk planning tasks, including: Manage which items they take bushwalking so that they do not forget anything they might need, plan meals for their walks, and automatically compile food/fuel shopping lists (lists of consumables) required to make and cook the meals for each walk. It is particularly useful for planning for groups who share food or other items, but is also useful for individual walkers.

Re: Backpack Conundrums

Postby wayno » Wed 16 May, 2012 7:22 pm

find a mail forwarding company in the states that will give you a US address that can be delivered to. and they will forward the package to you
from the land of the long white clouds...
User avatar
wayno
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 8685
Joined: Sun 19 Jun, 2011 7:26 am
Location: NZ
Region: New Zealand
Gender: Male

Re: Backpack Conundrums

Postby Gusto » Wed 16 May, 2012 7:44 pm

The lack of bottle holders is easily fixed by just attaching some. I use a bottle holder made by seat to summit. I attach it to my lowest compression strap.

As for the idea of a Golite pack. That simply will not last anywhere near as long as the other packs mentioned. It's not worth considering if you are choosing between the others.

The WE Mountain Expedition is a good pack too. It's very similar to the lost world in design. It's main differences is that it uses a lighter wight nylon and has a side zipper. It also happens to be much cheaper in cost (I think it's about $200 cheaper.) The harness is almost the same. I believe the face fabric is a mesh instead of canvas. It is intentionally designed for alpine usage so it's lifespan is probably shorter than that of the Lost World if you are using it in the bush more.
Gusto
Athrotaxis cupressoides
Athrotaxis cupressoides
 
Posts: 375
Joined: Wed 21 Sep, 2011 10:35 pm
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: Backpack Conundrums

Postby bushwalker zane » Wed 16 May, 2012 8:43 pm

Gusto wrote:As for the idea of a Golite pack. That simply will not last anywhere near as long as the other packs mentioned. It's not worth considering if you are choosing between the others.


Yeah, after reading into it a lot more I quickly discovered that light weight doesn't equal long lasting. Weight for me isn't really a problem as I don't mind carrying a bit more.

Gusto wrote:The WE Mountain Expedition is a good pack too. It's very similar to the lost world in design. It's main differences is that it uses a lighter wight nylon and has a side zipper. It also happens to be much cheaper in cost (I think it's about $200 cheaper.) The harness is almost the same. I believe the face fabric is a mesh instead of canvas. It is intentionally designed for alpine usage so it's lifespan is probably shorter than that of the Lost World if you are using it in the bush more.


This was the same answer I got from WE. As well as a bit of logical thinking. I do in fact do a lot of bush-bashing. So a sturdy pack is indeed in need. I'm pretty much sold on the Lost World. I've sourced them at $480ish from hiking.com.au, so that looks like a go! I'll no doubt let you all know with the decision I make on this subject.
User avatar
bushwalker zane
Athrotaxis selaginoides
Athrotaxis selaginoides
 
Posts: 1206
Joined: Mon 09 May, 2011 9:46 am
Region: Tasmania
Gender: Male

Re: Backpack Conundrums

Postby dannnnn » Wed 16 May, 2012 10:16 pm

i have an old WE travel pack that my old man gave me many many years ago... and it is impossible to damage but really comfy to wear. i wish i could get a similar aussie-made WE hiking pack. so much love for their gear. oh well.
dannnnn
Athrotaxis cupressoides
Athrotaxis cupressoides
 
Posts: 159
Joined: Mon 11 Apr, 2011 4:29 pm
Region: Queensland
Gender: Male

Re: Backpack Conundrums

Postby icemancometh » Thu 17 May, 2012 12:06 am

go the WE

you know it fits well and does the job
and they are the two most critical features when it comes to pack

they seem to be more reliable to me too, though I've never owned a One Planet...just never been tempted
icemancometh
Athrotaxis cupressoides
Athrotaxis cupressoides
 
Posts: 361
Joined: Thu 15 Dec, 2011 9:45 am
Region: New South Wales

Re: Backpack Conundrums

Postby Mutley » Fri 25 May, 2012 8:28 pm

Robert H wrote:
Mutley wrote:I have owned a Macmillan for a few years. [...] The bottom pack access is good in theory but I have not really used it.

Sounds like you own a Strezlecki, as the McMillan does not have a bottom opening.

The McMilan is also slightly larger (+5L), has crampon attachments and a useful bungee system on the front. In my eyes the McMilan is the better pack of the two.



Er yes. A bit embarrassing. They look so similar,but it is a strez. The bungee system on the front would be very handy. I've been thinking of stitching on some loops and Velcro on the front straps for a gps, camera, compass etc.
User avatar
Mutley
Athrotaxis cupressoides
Athrotaxis cupressoides
 
Posts: 210
Joined: Tue 14 Jun, 2011 8:42 pm
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Previous

Return to Equipment

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 96 guests