learning to sleep on a UL mat

Bushwalking gear and paraphernalia. Electronic gadget topics (inc. GPS, PLB, chargers) belong in the 'Techno Babble' sub-forum.
Forum rules
TIP: The online Bushwalk Inventory System can help bushwalkers with a variety of bushwalk planning tasks, including: Manage which items they take bushwalking so that they do not forget anything they might need, plan meals for their walks, and automatically compile food/fuel shopping lists (lists of consumables) required to make and cook the meals for each walk. It is particularly useful for planning for groups who share food or other items, but is also useful for individual walkers.

Re: learning to sleep on a UL mat

Postby icefest » Wed 18 Sep, 2013 12:32 am

Here is my train of thought:

Ignoring R-value of less than 4.5. (I use it in winter too)
You get this table: (sorted by weight in g of LW, and R value)
Image

At this point Xtherm is the lightest by 140g (cf Downmat UL 7)



You will remember that I also mentioned toughness. Here I decided top use denier as ballistic/tear stength isn't supplied by either company. This is for the bottom layer which I'm more likely to likely to puncture on a rock etc. (if need be I can flip it in the snow.)
The Exped UL mats are 20 denier. The normal Exped maps are 75 denier. Neoair are 70 denier on bottom.
The UL mats were decided to be less tough.

When I exclude the UL mats I get:
Image
Compared to the Downmat 7, the Xtherm is 540g lighter. (520g lighter than the Sunmat 7 @ R4.9)


Here is the full comparison: http://puu.sh/4tAW7.png This has direct weight/insulation ratios.
Any errors feel free to correct me.
Men wanted for hazardous journey. Low wages, bitter cold, long hours of complete darkness. Safe return doubtful.
User avatar
icefest
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 4518
Joined: Fri 27 May, 2011 11:19 pm
Location: www.canyoninginvictoria.org
Region: Victoria

Re: learning to sleep on a UL mat

Postby Orion » Wed 18 Sep, 2013 2:35 am

Strider wrote:
Orion wrote:Ironically, it turns out I'd need a UL mat so large that it would be heavier than my non-UL mat.

But likely 10x more comfortable..

A large UL mat may be more comfortable but there's no way it's ten times. I have a car camping "Luxury" Thermarest that is 63x196x5 cm, comparable to the larger UL mats. It's definately more comfortable than my short Prolite Plus but not by that much really. Even my bed at home isn't ten times more comfortable.

I sleep perfectly well on the Prolite Plus. I'm happy with it. I'd go with a lighter mat provided it were no less comfortable.


It's interesting to read that there are more than just a few people who dislike the NeoAir. That's news to me.
Orion
Athrotaxis selaginoides
Athrotaxis selaginoides
 
Posts: 1963
Joined: Mon 02 Feb, 2009 12:33 pm
Region: Other Country

Re: learning to sleep on a UL mat

Postby icefest » Wed 18 Sep, 2013 1:17 pm

I think a lot over people forget that convection mainly transfers heat up or across (assuming a density decrease with increased temperature). Assuming you don't move much in your sleep, the air in the mat should stratify and make radiation the main form of heat transfer.
Air is a pretty crap conductor of heat.
This just leaves radiation, where the best insulator is a reflective surface tuned to a certain black body radiation (infrared in this case).

Down is great against all three forms of heat transfer, but not as good as a silvered surface at preventing radiation. It's just overkill in a sleeping mat.

Maybe Thermarest have a patent on this tech, but I'd have no problem buying an Exped if they made them like this. They do make them cheaper.
At least, that's what my limited understandings of thermodynamics tell me. Feel free to correct my mistakes.
Men wanted for hazardous journey. Low wages, bitter cold, long hours of complete darkness. Safe return doubtful.
User avatar
icefest
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 4518
Joined: Fri 27 May, 2011 11:19 pm
Location: www.canyoninginvictoria.org
Region: Victoria

Re: learning to sleep on a UL mat

Postby Joomy » Thu 19 Sep, 2013 1:07 am

icefest wrote:Here is my train of thought:

Ignoring R-value of less than 4.5. (I use it in winter too)

I guess if you narrow your parameters to 4.5+ R value and high-denier fabrics then yes, the X-therm is the obvious choice. But I and many others use 3-season mats in winter by supplementing them with thin CCF mats. And by thin I mean between 3 and 5mm thin. This seems to work well, although why exactly it does is not entirely clear since a 3-4mm CCF mat only has an R-value of around .75 maximum, but it does provide 4-season warmth.

icefest wrote:I think a lot over people forget that convection mainly transfers heat up or across (assuming a density decrease with increased temperature). Assuming you don't move much in your sleep, the air in the mat should stratify and make radiation the main form of heat transfer.
Air is a pretty crap conductor of heat.
This just leaves radiation, where the best insulator is a reflective surface tuned to a certain black body radiation (infrared in this case).

Down is great against all three forms of heat transfer, but not as good as a silvered surface at preventing radiation. It's just overkill in a sleeping mat.

Maybe Thermarest have a patent on this tech, but I'd have no problem buying an Exped if they made them like this. They do make them cheaper.
At least, that's what my limited understandings of thermodynamics tell me. Feel free to correct my mistakes.

I think your assumption that a block of air should act as an insulating layer is flawed. In theory you might think that hot air should rise and stay at the top, but in practice this doesn't happen at all. Not sure exactly why, I'm guessing it's at least partly because your body doesn't heat the mat evenly, but circulating currents definitely do form which suck your body heat away and transfer it to the ground. Either way, that's the whole point behind down or synthetic insulation or the mini-baffles in the NeoAir mattresses -- they limit the amount of air circulation, and therefore limits heat transfer by convection.
Joomy
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
 
Posts: 601
Joined: Tue 22 May, 2012 6:40 pm
Region: Australian Capital Territory
Gender: Male

Re: learning to sleep on a UL mat

Postby Strider » Thu 19 Sep, 2013 9:05 am

Yes for outright insulative capability and fabric strength, the Xtherm comes out on top.

BUT, you are missing the most important criterion of all - comfort. Not all gear purchases can be made purely based on specs.
User avatar
Strider
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 5875
Joined: Mon 07 Nov, 2011 6:55 pm
Location: Point Cook
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: learning to sleep on a UL mat

Postby Orion » Thu 19 Sep, 2013 9:57 am

Joomy wrote:...I and many others use 3-season mats in winter by supplementing them with thin CCF mats. And by thin I mean between 3 and 5mm thin. This seems to work well, although why exactly it does is not entirely clear since a 3-4mm CCF mat only has an R-value of around .75 maximum, but it does provide 4-season warmth.

That makes sense. Many 3-season mats are already pretty warm. For example a NeoAir XLite is R 3.2 so adding another .7 to that puts you in 4-season range. I use a Prolite Plus (3.8) by itself on the winter snow.
Orion
Athrotaxis selaginoides
Athrotaxis selaginoides
 
Posts: 1963
Joined: Mon 02 Feb, 2009 12:33 pm
Region: Other Country

Previous

Return to Equipment

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 74 guests