New WE Lightweight Pack

Bushwalking gear and paraphernalia. Electronic gadget topics (inc. GPS, PLB, chargers) belong in the 'Techno Babble' sub-forum.
Forum rules
TIP: The online Bushwalk Inventory System can help bushwalkers with a variety of bushwalk planning tasks, including: Manage which items they take bushwalking so that they do not forget anything they might need, plan meals for their walks, and automatically compile food/fuel shopping lists (lists of consumables) required to make and cook the meals for each walk. It is particularly useful for planning for groups who share food or other items, but is also useful for individual walkers.

Re: New WE Lightweight Pack

Postby Joomy » Sat 28 Sep, 2013 11:15 am

jacko1956 wrote:
Joomy wrote:
jacko1956 wrote:At least 50% of packs on the Appalachian Trail this year were Osprey.
Far and away most popular pack.

I chalk that up to their ubiquity and ignorance on the part of the consumer of better alternatives. Osprey may have been pioneers in the lightweight synthetic pack market 15 years ago but now it is all about the cottage manufacturers (as you well know). ULA are the new Osprey for sure. Feature-rich, rugged enough (short of pack hauling/throwing), comfy, and light, light, light!

I don't necessarily agree with that.
I have two ULA packs and love them but the Ospreys for very little extra weight do keep the pack off your back a bit more which reduces that sweat patch on your lower back and they have the "lid" as well which can double as a daypack - useful for "slackpacking" on a trail like the AT.
ULA's were second most common pack. A fair number of cuben fibre packs were around too.

Well I'm not saying that Osprey make bad bags per se. You're not going to die or collapse from pain if you buy one, but there are many better alternatives for similar prices. You say very little extra weight but the Circuit weighs about 400g less than the Kestrel 48 to which it is similarly sized and doesn't carry as well, IMO. The Exo 46 however weighs about the same as the Circuit, but I would argue is probably less durable. The Exo series are nice packs for open country but not for bush bushing or rock scraping.
Joomy
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
 
Posts: 601
Joined: Tue 22 May, 2012 6:40 pm
Region: Australian Capital Territory
Gender: Male

Re: New WE Lightweight Pack

Postby Strider » Sat 28 Sep, 2013 11:31 am

wayno wrote:ULA?

For a gear freak, this REALLY surprises me Wayne!
User avatar
Strider
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 5875
Joined: Mon 07 Nov, 2011 6:55 pm
Location: Point Cook
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: New WE Lightweight Pack

Postby wayno » Sun 29 Sep, 2013 8:15 am

Strider wrote:
wayno wrote:ULA?

For a gear freak, this REALLY surprises me Wayne!


yup theres just so much out there, I"m not that up on the ultralight gear or the cottage industry gear, definitely a lot of people here who know a lot more than i do about this stuff, i could tell you about a few brands, I have seen these packs before but only recognised the images and not the brand.
from the land of the long white clouds...
User avatar
wayno
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 8685
Joined: Sun 19 Jun, 2011 7:26 am
Location: NZ
Region: New Zealand
Gender: Male

Re: New WE Lightweight Pack

Postby Happy Pirate » Tue 15 Oct, 2013 10:08 pm

Not the most sophisticated pack in the world but a 70l pack @ 1.7 kg for under $160.
I'm pretty happy with mine.
http://www.mainpeak.com.au/hike-camp/packs/hiking-packs/lowe-alpine-tfx-kongur-65-75-rucksack/

**Actually just looking at the specs the latest packs have had a significant weight gain @ 2.1 kg! My 2YO version tips the scales @ 1.74kg.**
Steve
With a Glass Eye & 3 Wooden Legs:
http://www.glasseyephoto.com.au
User avatar
Happy Pirate
Athrotaxis cupressoides
Athrotaxis cupressoides
 
Posts: 489
Joined: Fri 02 Mar, 2012 2:32 pm
Location: Hobart
Region: Australia
Gender: Male

Re: New WE Lightweight Pack

Postby McWade » Wed 16 Oct, 2013 12:43 am

I bought an Osprey Volt from Bivouac not long ago for AUS$170 delivered. It's on the light side at 1.7kg, has all the features I was after and none that I wasn't with the exception of the separate bottom compartment, but I'll probably cut the separating flap out as I won't use it. Only used it once with a medium load but I found it super comfy. Didn't use the external hydration bladder compartment so don't know how that will pan out. Not particularly robust material by the looks but perfectly fine for on track use. The lid on this model, though removable, isn't designed as a small day pack but could easily be used as such.
McWade
Atherosperma moschatum
Atherosperma moschatum
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Fri 24 Aug, 2012 6:36 pm
Region: Western Australia
Gender: Male

Re: New WE Lightweight Pack

Postby McWade » Wed 16 Oct, 2013 1:04 am

Oh, and it's the 75L. I quite like the access to bottle holders from the front (or is it back?). Also like the stow on go thing for pole storage. Thought it would hinder arm movement, and it does, but it's not too bad.
McWade
Atherosperma moschatum
Atherosperma moschatum
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Fri 24 Aug, 2012 6:36 pm
Region: Western Australia
Gender: Male

Re: New WE Lightweight Pack

Postby mtrain » Wed 16 Oct, 2013 8:43 pm

McWade, what sort of load were you carrying in the volt. I loaded 20kg in one and wore it round the shop for half an hour and it seemed pretty good.
mtrain
Atherosperma moschatum
Atherosperma moschatum
 
Posts: 78
Joined: Sat 14 Jan, 2012 1:50 pm
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: New WE Lightweight Pack

Postby wayno » Thu 17 Oct, 2013 11:40 am

found a review of a ULA pack, reviews of a couple more ULA packs on the right side of the page in the link

http://www.trailspace.com/gear/ula-equi ... eview29777
from the land of the long white clouds...
User avatar
wayno
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 8685
Joined: Sun 19 Jun, 2011 7:26 am
Location: NZ
Region: New Zealand
Gender: Male

Re: New WE Lightweight Pack

Postby McWade » Thu 17 Oct, 2013 3:41 pm

mtrain wrote:McWade, what sort of load were you carrying in the volt. I loaded 20kg in one and wore it round the shop for half an hour and it seemed pretty good.


14 kg with food and water when I headed out first morning so only around 10 base wait. Could easily have taken a 50L pack but wanted to give it a run. It cinched down fairly well so I was able to distribute the load acceptably from bottom to top even though it wasn't near full.

So I can't comment on heavy loads but it was very very comfortable and loaded on the hip well. My recent walks with much the same gear have been with a Deuter Futura 50+10, which is really not very comfortable because it feels like to load is pulling me backwards. There are a lot of things I like about the Futura but I just can't seem to balance it properly. I have a 32L version daypack and I like it because they really do seem to keep me cooler. So my comfort rating of the Osprey Volt is probably coloured by my recent walks being uncomfortable. Still, I like the pack design and the price was right so if it holds up I'll be happy.
McWade
Atherosperma moschatum
Atherosperma moschatum
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Fri 24 Aug, 2012 6:36 pm
Region: Western Australia
Gender: Male

Re: New WE Lightweight Pack

Postby 22F » Fri 25 Oct, 2013 9:29 pm

Ah, so that was the pack Ian was talking about!

I was fortunate to meet Ian and his darling wife last year, and they mentioned that trip and a new pack.
Forward!
Where we are, where we belong, where we should be.
22F
Atherosperma moschatum
Atherosperma moschatum
 
Posts: 63
Joined: Fri 28 May, 2010 11:39 am
Location: Back in Bris-vegas, lost in the brightlights of the Big Smoke
Region: Queensland
Gender: Male

Previous

Return to Equipment

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 70 guests