jacko1956 wrote:Joomy wrote:jacko1956 wrote:At least 50% of packs on the Appalachian Trail this year were Osprey.
Far and away most popular pack.
I chalk that up to their ubiquity and ignorance on the part of the consumer of better alternatives. Osprey may have been pioneers in the lightweight synthetic pack market 15 years ago but now it is all about the cottage manufacturers (as you well know). ULA are the new Osprey for sure. Feature-rich, rugged enough (short of pack hauling/throwing), comfy, and light, light, light!
I don't necessarily agree with that.
I have two ULA packs and love them but the Ospreys for very little extra weight do keep the pack off your back a bit more which reduces that sweat patch on your lower back and they have the "lid" as well which can double as a daypack - useful for "slackpacking" on a trail like the AT.
ULA's were second most common pack. A fair number of cuben fibre packs were around too.
Well I'm not saying that Osprey make bad bags per se. You're not going to die or collapse from pain if you buy one, but there are many better alternatives for similar prices. You say very little extra weight but the Circuit weighs about 400g less than the Kestrel 48 to which it is similarly sized and doesn't carry as well, IMO. The Exo 46 however weighs about the same as the Circuit, but I would argue is probably less durable. The Exo series are nice packs for open country but not for bush bushing or rock scraping.