MichaelfromQLD wrote: I've taken into account the "risks" vs advantages and found Volleys more than suitable for 80% of the walking I do. Being unsuitable for certain uses doesn't "end the case" for volleys for every other use.
Nuts wrote:Corvus, I don't think it is a fair challenge, bootless for jockless. I think you will need to also walk on your hands!
walkinTas wrote: I've seen twenty years of people trying to convince others that walking around the bush in volleys is cool.
walkinTas wrote:You recently had a one-day glimpse of the conditions here in Tassie. Those conditions are prevalent here for six months of the year or longer. So perhaps you understand why I'm surprised by some of your statements.
Right now in Tassie it would be totally unacceptable to "risk" hurting yourself on a walk in the highlands or any exposed area. Lets say you have walked three hours away from your car on a day walk. Its 1PM. You've turned your ankle and can't walk. You're alone. Its a day trip so you only have a day pack. You have 4 - 5 hours of sunlight left. No one will miss you before dark. Overnight temperature in Tassie tonight will be well below zero (bushwalking alerts have been issued).
Acceptable risk! I would prefer to Err on the side of caution. Advantages of volleys - they are called "sand" shoes for a reason. Suitable 80% of the time - Not in Tasmania. Unsuitable for certain uses - yep, like highland bushwalking in Tasmania in winter. :
walkinTas wrote: --- Was Speculator joking?Strange sense of humour - volleys are no joking matter.
MichaelfromQLD wrote:much better. volley good indeed.walkinTas wrote: --- Was Speculator joking?Strange sense of humour - volleys are no joking matter.
...59 ...60 ...times up!walkinTas wrote:And if I stop stirring MichaelfomQld for a minute...
corvus wrote:Scots have gone forth and multiplied in every Continent
corvus wrote:Rime frost settles from above ,Scots have gone forth and multiplied in every Continent ,the Kilt has 3 yards of worsted wool in its manufacture and belive me you dont get frosty underneath
tas-man wrote:However another aspect of the energy expenditure during bushwalking that was explained and demonstrated to me by an "old timer" in the BBW was that you need to "glide" over the terrain as much as possible by careful foot placement, avoiding unnecessary vertical "jogging" movement to your torso and pack, so that you minimise the energy use in raising and lowering your centre of gravity as you walk. Smoothly changing your elevation takes much less energy than rapid changes, especially when recovering from a slip or loss of balance. I recall this "old timer" moving so apparently effortlessly through the bush and seeming to have more energy at the end of the day than us young turks who were jumping all over the place!
corvus wrote:Yes SoaB
We have seen the pics of your feet after a barefoot excursion of only a short distance
Nuts wrote:Oh, I'm definitely a 'boot's bloke'.
Nuts wrote:It does seem, though, that many tassie walks would be just to rough to not have ankle protection (support aside).
corvus wrote:Why would you compromise basic safety by walking barefoot ,Hereby I issue a challange I will walk the Overland bare A@$ed in a Kilt with any one who wants to do it barefoot dont care Summer or Winter prize is bragging rights that you are still alive.
corvus
MichaelfromQLD wrote:corvus wrote:Rime frost settles from above ,Scots have gone forth and multiplied in every Continent ,the Kilt has 3 yards of worsted wool in its manufacture and belive me you dont get frosty underneath
Oh come on Corvus, don't let the facts get in the way of a highly amusing mental image.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 55 guests