Lightweight 0 degree sleeping bag.

Bushwalking gear and paraphernalia. Electronic gadget topics (inc. GPS, PLB, chargers) belong in the 'Techno Babble' sub-forum.
Forum rules
TIP: The online Bushwalk Inventory System can help bushwalkers with a variety of bushwalk planning tasks, including: Manage which items they take bushwalking so that they do not forget anything they might need, plan meals for their walks, and automatically compile food/fuel shopping lists (lists of consumables) required to make and cook the meals for each walk. It is particularly useful for planning for groups who share food or other items, but is also useful for individual walkers.

Re: Lightweight 0 degree sleeping bag.

Postby cams » Wed 28 Sep, 2011 9:46 am

photohiker wrote:Just came across Joe from zpacks new creation.

Crazy light bag/quilt setup. A long/wide -1* C runs 459g/$325, Multiple sizes and fill weights, $US300-350

Shortcomings are no hood and bottom zip.

Image

Image


Yeah, they are enticingly light, but his fill weights seem on the light side for the ratings.
User avatar
cams
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
 
Posts: 695
Joined: Tue 24 Aug, 2010 1:54 pm
Region: Tasmania
Gender: Male

Re: Lightweight 0 degree sleeping bag.

Postby photohiker » Wed 28 Sep, 2011 11:54 am

Yea, possibly. Looking for something to compare isn't easy, as these things have no hood.

Zpacks quilt Reg, Medium: 207g fill rated -1
OP Cocoon 400 Std: 400g fill, rated -4
WM Summerlite 6': 255g fill, rated 0
HG Burrow 40*: 200g fill, rated 4.5
HG Burrow 20*: 340g fill, rated -7

Yes, I know, EN13537 ignored in this post except for the OP bag :)

With the minimal price variations in the zpack range, it could be worth getting the warmer quilt rated to -7 with an extra 92g of fill in the reg/medium size like above for $20 extra.
Michael
User avatar
photohiker
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 3097
Joined: Sun 17 May, 2009 12:31 pm
Location: Adelaide, dreaming up where to go next.

Re: Lightweight 0 degree sleeping bag.

Postby cams » Wed 28 Sep, 2011 12:16 pm

photohiker wrote:Yea, possibly. Looking for something to compare isn't easy, as these things have no hood.


True. And yeah, the fact you can customise them so much is great.
User avatar
cams
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
 
Posts: 695
Joined: Tue 24 Aug, 2010 1:54 pm
Region: Tasmania
Gender: Male

Re: Lightweight 0 degree sleeping bag.

Postby blacksheep » Wed 28 Sep, 2011 6:10 pm

With so much heat loss through the head, and no hood...i have doubts.
Good design is a kind of alchemy.
www.alchemy-equipment.com
User avatar
blacksheep
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
 
Posts: 720
Joined: Thu 27 Nov, 2008 5:03 pm
ASSOCIATED ORGANISATIONS: TBA.
Region: New Zealand
Gender: Male

Re: Lightweight 0 degree sleeping bag.

Postby mattmacman » Thu 29 Sep, 2011 11:35 am

blacksheep wrote:With so much heat loss through the head, and no hood...i have doubts.

Beanie/ Balaclava and hooded fleece, will still be slightly colder but will be more versatile.
mattmacman
Athrotaxis cupressoides
Athrotaxis cupressoides
 
Posts: 313
Joined: Tue 19 Apr, 2011 12:34 am
Region: Western Australia
Gender: Male

Re: Lightweight 0 degree sleeping bag.

Postby blacksheep » Thu 29 Sep, 2011 2:08 pm

mattmacman wrote:
blacksheep wrote:With so much heat loss through the head, and no hood...i have doubts.

Beanie/ Balaclava and hooded fleece, will still be slightly colder but will be more versatile.

I'm talking abou their temp rating. The manikin used to determine an accurate rating would loose all the heat through the "head"..not saying the product isn't fine for many applications, but how they give their temp ratings is not above questioning.
Good design is a kind of alchemy.
www.alchemy-equipment.com
User avatar
blacksheep
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
 
Posts: 720
Joined: Thu 27 Nov, 2008 5:03 pm
ASSOCIATED ORGANISATIONS: TBA.
Region: New Zealand
Gender: Male

Re: Lightweight 0 degree sleeping bag.

Postby photohiker » Thu 29 Sep, 2011 2:30 pm

blacksheep wrote:I'm talking abou their temp rating. The manikin used to determine an accurate rating would loose all the heat through the "head"..not saying the product isn't fine for many applications, but how they give their temp ratings is not above questioning.


Apart from the OP bag, these are all US based cottage industry quilts. Questioning is helpful and valid, but EN13537 is not spoken over there, and even if it were, cottage industry wouldn't be able to pony up for the testing costs.

I suspect the ratings are based on seat of the pants and experimentation, height of baffles, quality of down etc.

I can tell you that my WM Ultralite overfill is too hot in most situations I've taken it. WM rate it at -9 and I've been too hot in it at 0C so this seat of the pants can be reasonably useful as long as you know if you sleep hot or cold relative to others. Most times I sleep without the hood anyway.
Michael
User avatar
photohiker
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 3097
Joined: Sun 17 May, 2009 12:31 pm
Location: Adelaide, dreaming up where to go next.

Re: Lightweight 0 degree sleeping bag.

Postby Macca81 » Thu 29 Sep, 2011 2:50 pm

blacksheep wrote:With so much heat loss through the head, and no hood...i have doubts.


Ok im a bit over hearing this myth repeatedly on bushwalking forums... The head loses no more heat than any other part of the body. Having no hood will have no greater effect than sticking an arm out. A beanie/balaclava will cover 99% of the heat loss that would result from no hood on a bag and even without that you would still lose hardly anything.
geoskid wrote:nothing but the best of several brands will do :)
User avatar
Macca81
Auctorita modica
Auctorita modica
 
Posts: 644
Joined: Wed 08 Apr, 2009 3:02 pm
Location: Hobart, Tasmania
ASSOCIATED ORGANISATIONS: Herbalife
Region: Tasmania
Gender: Male

Re: Lightweight 0 degree sleeping bag.

Postby Macca81 » Thu 29 Sep, 2011 2:53 pm

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/dec/17/medicalresearch-humanbehaviour
25 seconds after my last post and google pulls up this. Im sure i can find something from a science journal if i wanted too also...


Im all for good debate regarding temp ratings etc, but the reality is that a hood will only have a small amount of difference. Particularly on something like the above quilt which is designed for ultra light hikers who layer up to sleep and almost certainly are wearing a beanie at the least...
geoskid wrote:nothing but the best of several brands will do :)
User avatar
Macca81
Auctorita modica
Auctorita modica
 
Posts: 644
Joined: Wed 08 Apr, 2009 3:02 pm
Location: Hobart, Tasmania
ASSOCIATED ORGANISATIONS: Herbalife
Region: Tasmania
Gender: Male

Re: Lightweight 0 degree sleeping bag.

Postby ILUVSWTAS » Thu 29 Sep, 2011 2:57 pm

Macca81 wrote:
blacksheep wrote:With so much heat loss through the head, and no hood...i have doubts.


Ok im a bit over hearing this myth repeatedly on bushwalking forums... The head loses no more heat than any other part of the body. Having no hood will have no greater effect than sticking an arm out.



Interesting comment. What facts are you basing that on? Im just curious as I believe the head looses alot of body heat!!

EDIT - I just had a browse through your link, thats interesting! BUT if im cold when im walking, i put a beannie on and im much warmer....
Last edited by ILUVSWTAS on Thu 29 Sep, 2011 3:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nothing to see here.
User avatar
ILUVSWTAS
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 11027
Joined: Sun 28 Dec, 2008 9:53 am
Region: Tasmania
Gender: Male

Re: Lightweight 0 degree sleeping bag.

Postby ULWalkingPhil » Thu 29 Sep, 2011 3:12 pm

I just wear a beanie. Always have, never owned a bag with a hood. My beanie is about 10 or 15 years old. and only weighs 68 grams. Kept me warm in temps down to 0.

I know one thing for sure, If I don't wear a beanie when it's cold, I freeze. Same as my feet. I do believe that a lot of warmth is lost through your feet and head.
User avatar
ULWalkingPhil
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 2269
Joined: Wed 05 Jan, 2011 2:14 pm
Region: Queensland

Re: Lightweight 0 degree sleeping bag.

Postby photohiker » Thu 29 Sep, 2011 3:31 pm

I _think_ the reference to losing most of the heat through your head is that the rest of your body is already covered.

So it's right, but its wrong. Any exposed part of your body will lose heat according to circulation and surface area.

Blacksheep's observation is correct too, but we already know that quilt users pop on beanies and balaclavas etc to counter heat loss normally catered for by the SB hood.
Michael
User avatar
photohiker
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 3097
Joined: Sun 17 May, 2009 12:31 pm
Location: Adelaide, dreaming up where to go next.

Re: Lightweight 0 degree sleeping bag.

Postby alliecat » Thu 29 Sep, 2011 3:37 pm

Macca is quite right - the head loses heat at pretty much the same rate as the rest of the body. The myth is a distortion of the fact that if the rest of your body is covered (but not your head) then the most effective thing to do to reduce heat loss is to put on a hat rather than add more clothing elsewhere. That's not because the head is in any way special, it's just because that's the only uncovered bit! The truth is that an uncovered head will lose heat much faster than a covered body - the important words got dropped somewhere along the way and we got the myth.

Damn - photohiker beat me to it :)

Cold hands hand feet (if already covered) are almost always the result of circulation problems, and adding more gloves or socks wont really help much - you need to get more blood to those areas. Actually, adding more clothing can sometimes make limbs and extremities feel colder by restricting the circulation even more.

Cheers,
Alliecat
alliecat
Athrotaxis cupressoides
Athrotaxis cupressoides
 
Posts: 314
Joined: Thu 29 May, 2008 2:17 pm
Region: Tasmania

Re: Lightweight 0 degree sleeping bag.

Postby icemancometh » Sat 07 Jan, 2012 5:53 pm

the Z pack quilt/bag also looks narrow, even the wide one

climbing shoulders and propensity to sleep on one's side often means mummy bags dont r3eally work, least not for a good night's sleep in amummy
taken to opening my bags and rezipping them to make quilts like the z pack design anyway

The Z pack cold bag in long wide would be alright i reckon
icemancometh
Athrotaxis cupressoides
Athrotaxis cupressoides
 
Posts: 361
Joined: Thu 15 Dec, 2011 9:45 am
Region: New South Wales

Re: Lightweight 0 degree sleeping bag.

Postby Mountain Rocket » Sun 08 Jan, 2012 7:42 am

alliecat wrote:Cold hands hand feet (if already covered) are almost always the result of circulation problems, and adding more gloves or socks wont really help much - you need to get more blood to those areas.

I remember reading somewhere that if your hands are feet are cold it is because your body is pumping more blood to other parts of your body (ie. head/brain). It made sense to me when I thought about it. Your body would surely prioritize your brain over your limbs (hence frostbite?) and as you said adding additional clothing to those areas will often have little to no effect (and as you pointed out, it can actually be detrimental).

If it means anything... I for one am a firm believer in a good hood on a bag.
User avatar
Mountain Rocket
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
 
Posts: 849
Joined: Sat 27 Aug, 2011 5:46 pm
Region: Tasmania
Gender: Male

Re: Lightweight 0 degree sleeping bag.

Postby Franco » Sun 08 Jan, 2012 8:28 am

As a few have commented, it is based on a misunderstanding on what "if your feet are cold, put a hat on " is meant to convey.
Take note how often you will see folk with 3 or 4 torso layers on and yet no (warm) hat or gloves.
Chances are that they will sweat and be cold at the same time.
Even if your head loses exactly the same amount of heat as the rest of the body, that would mean that it needs the same amount of insulation

Blacksheep is correct in questioning the rating of a hoodless bag IF it isn't explained that they are meant to be used with some headwear.
Or to put it another way, if you add the headwear to the other bags in the list, than they would be warmer too.
Obvious to some but again not to all.
Franco
Franco
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 2916
Joined: Thu 30 Oct, 2008 6:48 pm
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Previous

Return to Equipment

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests