by radson » Thu 26 Sep, 2013 2:21 pm
Im late to the party on this one but kind of curious as to how FF bags could be considered superior to S2S. I have a FF Peregrine, MHW Ghost, MB Ultra hugger and also sleeping bags collected over the years from PHD, Millet and Fairydown. Yes, I do now have a 'relationship' with S2S but even prior to that my Alpine series was my go to bag for cold weather sleeping. Besides all the great storage options it comes with, i find my Alpine just 'pops' so much better than my other bags after taking out of the stuff sack.
One thing I will totally agree with is that the Alpine is snug. I am 183 cm and definitely needed the long. I used the Alpine III for 3 months last year in Pakistan and absolutely loved the bag. I totally understand that FF can be made with several shell options but I found the S2S shell repelled water while remaining breathable much more than my FF bag. And I'm comparing extended use expedition to expedition use. The only reason I would pick my FF bag now would be for a trip where I am required to lounge around base camp as it is roomier, certainly not for taking up high, when weight and compactness are more of an issue. S2S in my oh so humble opinion are world class bags and I hope not viewed as secondary just because they are not American.