Which sleeping combination would be warmer?

Bushwalking gear and paraphernalia. Electronic gadget topics (inc. GPS, PLB, chargers) belong in the 'Techno Babble' sub-forum.
Forum rules
TIP: The online Bushwalk Inventory System can help bushwalkers with a variety of bushwalk planning tasks, including: Manage which items they take bushwalking so that they do not forget anything they might need, plan meals for their walks, and automatically compile food/fuel shopping lists (lists of consumables) required to make and cook the meals for each walk. It is particularly useful for planning for groups who share food or other items, but is also useful for individual walkers.

Which sleeping combination would be warmer?

Postby LAMEA-Gals » Sat 23 Mar, 2013 9:17 am

Hi there
Planning my next 7 day winter trip to WA and have got the scales out checking my gear - looking for weight savings etc.

I'm a bit stuck on what sleeping combination would be the warmest for the weight. My two options are
Option 1.
- I have a Marmot Atom (550grams, comfortable to about 8 degrees for me), combined with an Exped downmat short (weighing in at 700g). I find the Exped super comfortable and warm but it is bulky and heavy.
Option 2.
- My Western mountaineering ultralite sleeping bag (830grams, comfortable to about 2 degrees for me), combined with a Thermarest 3/4 Prolite (weighing 320grams). The Prolite is OK but not as warm or comfortable as the Exped.

So the question I'm considering is as they are roughly the same weight (100 grams difference) am I better off (in regards to warmth) going for a system with a warm top layer/thin bottom layer or a system with a not so warm top layer but a very warm bottom layer?

I'm expecting single degree temps at night on the walk (probably in the 5 to 9 degree range) - I also am an average sleeper - ie not too warm, not too cold
User avatar
LAMEA-Gals
Atherosperma moschatum
Atherosperma moschatum
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Wed 06 Jan, 2010 2:59 pm
Region: New South Wales
Gender: Female

Re: Which sleeping combination would be warmer?

Postby Franco » Sat 23 Mar, 2013 9:35 am

The performance of a mat has to do with ground and not air temperature.
My guess would be that the Exped will be more comfortable but not noticeably warmer (in WA ) then the Prolite, however the Ultralite will be a lot warmer than the Atom.
Franco
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 2916
Joined: Thu 30 Oct, 2008 6:48 pm
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: Which sleeping combination would be warmer?

Postby roysta » Sat 23 Mar, 2013 10:03 am

Option 2, but keep an eye on the conditions in the days leading up to your departure.
Things can vary from season to season.
If it turns out to be colder there's always Option 3, the Exped with the Ultralite and try to seek weight reductions elsewhere.
User avatar
roysta
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
 
Posts: 674
Joined: Mon 22 Dec, 2008 8:14 am
Location: New South Wales
Region: New South Wales
Gender: Male

Re: Which sleeping combination would be warmer?

Postby Orion » Sat 23 Mar, 2013 11:05 am

LAMEA-Gals wrote:The Prolite is OK but not as warm or comfortable as the Exped.

Can you really feel the cold through your Prolite?
Orion
Athrotaxis selaginoides
Athrotaxis selaginoides
 
Posts: 1963
Joined: Mon 02 Feb, 2009 12:33 pm
Region: Other Country

Re: Which sleeping combination would be warmer?

Postby LAMEA-Gals » Sun 24 Mar, 2013 8:17 am

The Pro-lite doesn't feel cold but clearly not as comfy as the Exped. The Exped definately feels warmer on any surface I've used it on.

I got a feeling Option 2 is where I'm heading - the bulk of the Exped is a clear disadvantage as I'm aiming to pack 7 days worth of gear/foor into a One Planet Shadow. Also the Western Mountaineering bag has a better temperature range.
User avatar
LAMEA-Gals
Atherosperma moschatum
Atherosperma moschatum
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Wed 06 Jan, 2010 2:59 pm
Region: New South Wales
Gender: Female


Return to Equipment

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 74 guests