Tony wrote:
Bushwalking in general has its risks, just because a canister may leak, I do not think it is a reason to carry a spare, do we carry a spare tent because some tents get damaged in storms, or a spare pair of boots because some boots fall apart, a spare pack because some have pack failure, etc.
Tony
Yes, some things get blurred in the quest to 'be prepared' don't they. Its not so much a single gas cylinder as applying this as a unswaying 'attitude'. Surely no one carrys two cylinders for a single night? When does the second cylinder get added, how do you know how much you use each day, slow trial and error or measurement.. Each to their own but, for some, its not going to be a supprise that a light weight pack is a bit of a lost cause.
Taken to its logical conclusion, i find it at odds that people talk about 'gear' as the keystone to being prepared. To me, its just as important to be prepared considering 'gear' last.
Getting away from gas cylinders perhaps but the way of thinking can be applied to everything gear related can't it...
I think a second cylinder is a good idea for longer walks if you know your going to come anywhere near using the first but some food that doesnt need heat is as likely an even safer strategy, i'm sure Baden would agree... (but then scouts, from what ive seen, are classically 'overburdened' and, just as likely as anyone, underprepared

though watch out for a freethinker amongst them

)