by frenchy_84 » Tue 29 Jan, 2013 11:36 am
Recording heights (to a known datum) in the Himalaya will be interesting.
Firstly make sure you have a GPS that does not record heights by using an altimeter. Lonely Planet Hiking in the Nepal Himalaya states" If you carry a properly calibrated altimeter on a trek you will find that it agrees with elevations listed here up to an elevation of about 3500m. At higher eleviations your altimeter will read lower than the elevations in this book and shown on maps. Altimeters are calibrated to compensate for temperature change according to a standard formula that doesnt fit Nepal's climatic conditions. This causes the altimeter to read 416m low at 4000m and 650 low at 5000m. To be accurate record the temperature and make necessary conversion to obtain the correct altitude. Read your altimeters instruction book for more details." The improtant bit to take out of that is that the error is not linear/consitent so altitude plot would be screwed.
Now, using GPS measurement heights, will provide ellipsoidal heights (ie not relative to sea level). I have no idea what kind of datum is used in the himalaya, or if they have any conversion to sea level (im sure they do somewhere). Also out of anywhere on earth, I imagine that in the himalaya you will find the most extreme differences between ellipsoidal heights and Geoid heights (sea level). However the difference will remain relatively constant so while ellipsoidal heights may not give you true heights atleast your altitude plot will have reasonably good relative accuracy.
So after all this rambling make sure you have a GPS that doesnt use an altimeter to measure elevation.
PS I plan to be walking the 3 passes trek in April, which trek are you doing?