Tue 29 Jan, 2008 8:28 am
Tue 29 Jan, 2008 8:57 am
Tue 29 Jan, 2008 9:12 am
Tue 29 Jan, 2008 9:22 am
tasadam wrote:Note to self - don't be lazy...
Tue 29 Jan, 2008 9:30 am
walkinTas wrote:...Don't be too lazy to: Zoom in and check photo after every shot.tasadam wrote:Note to self - don't be lazy...
Tue 29 Jan, 2008 9:36 am
tasadam wrote:walkinTas wrote:Something I have been trying to do of late is to take the time to get it right - if it's worth taking, I might as well spend the time to get it as best I can so I try to take it properly...
Wed 10 Jun, 2009 10:40 pm
Then there's post processing - who has time for that? Or am I just too darn lazy...
Wed 10 Jun, 2009 11:21 pm
lexharris wrote:The photography forums of the world are littered with endless digital vs. film debates. If it was so clear-cut the debates would have been over long ago, but they're not. What is happening is that the finer points are beginning to emerge, and they are not always in favour of digital.
Actually these same photography forums also show a resurgence of interest in film. And new films are being released, Kodak released Ektar 100 in 135 format late last year, and just 2 months ago they released it in 120 format as well in response to demand from photographers.
Thu 11 Jun, 2009 12:10 am
Thu 11 Jun, 2009 8:22 am
photohiker wrote:I can't remember any of these debates in recent times at the half dozen or so photo sites I occasionally visit . A couple of years ago, it was rife. (maybe I visit the wrong places)
photohiker wrote:Mostly, people seem to have a respect for both mediums, and because of the relative rarity it's getting to the stage that people are becoming somewhat in awe of film users. For sure, there are benefits and disadvantages associated with either. In the end, it's up to the user to squeeze the best result out of their chosen medium and there is just as much tinker room with film as there is with digital (probably more with film if you include digital transfer and manipulation of the film images). I think it's true to say that the tinkering is more accessible with digital because it is mostly performed on the user's computer while film requires specialised and expensive equipment and access to darkrooms etc and the knowledge to be able to use it.
It doesn't matter the method or medium, it's about the result.
Thu 11 Jun, 2009 9:32 am
Thu 11 Jun, 2009 10:17 am
Thu 11 Jun, 2009 9:33 pm
Fri 12 Jun, 2009 11:49 am
Fri 12 Jun, 2009 12:21 pm
Fri 12 Jun, 2009 12:39 pm
Mon 15 Jun, 2009 8:53 pm
tasadam wrote:Aren't we spoilt with digital photography...
Remember when we were out there with film, how much care we spent time on getting everything just right to take the photo... Then anxiously wait for the film to be developed before we could check our results?.
© Bushwalk Australia and contributors 2007-2013.