
Here are a couple of photos, one with the Canon and one with the Olympus. File sizes are reduced, but the shots are roughly comparable. I tell myself it was worth parting with all those $$$ not so much because the photos are that much better, but more because the Canon seems to be more consistent. Occasionally the Olympus gets it better, but more often the Canon hits the spot. Also the Olympus's 4/3rds sensor seems to be a dead-end, and the larger sensor size (and higher megapixel count) seem to allow for better cropping and blow-ups with the Canon.
Excuse the amateur take on all this. I think I'm just starting on a steep learning curve, with my Canon in hand!

cheers
Peter
PS - Yes, Nikonians, I did consider a few Nikon models. But just at the moment, they don't seem to have exactly what I'm after.
