Desktop version
Tasmania specific bushwalking discussion.

Forum rules

Tasmania specific bushwalking discussion. Please avoid publishing details of access to sensitive areas with no tracks.
Post a reply

Arthurs Traverse

Tue 08 Dec, 2009 12:51 pm

Heyo.

A group of three of us are heading off to do the Arthurs Traverse, starting Scotts Peak on the 27th Dec, finishing Farmhouse Creek by the 10th of Jan (hopefully with some sidetrips - Lake Sydney, if the weather is good, Vanishing Falls, if the weather and our going is particularly good).

We'll be car shuffling, dropping one off at Farmhouse on Boxing Day, then heading to Scotts Peak Dam with the other. If anyone needs a lift into either point at this time, let me know and I might be able to help.

Cheers.

Re: Arthurs Traverse

Tue 08 Dec, 2009 1:00 pm

Er, I'd say a 'side trip' to Vanishing Falls might be a tad abitious... :?
from the Farmhouse Creek track you'd be looking at around a week or more return to the falls!

A side trip to Lake Sydney is fine, it's only half a day each way + an extra day if you wanted to do Bobs as well.

15 days for Western + Eastern + Bobs sounds reasonable.

Best to read Chapmans South west Tas guide for estimated times.

Stu.

Re: Arthurs Traverse

Tue 08 Dec, 2009 1:32 pm

stubowling wrote:Er, I'd say a 'side trip' to Vanishing Falls might be a tad abitious... :?
Stu.


umm... listen to the man, in light of the events of the last few days - listen VERY closely.
Don't even consider a side trip to vanishing falls, you are looking at at least a 4 day trip ONE WAY to get there over Bobs Knobs.

15 days to do the complete arthurs traverse is a reasonable period if you are fit and experienced, but I don't think you'll have much time left for side trips, particularly if you get a few days of crud which is almost guaranteed at that time of the year.

Re: Arthurs Traverse

Tue 08 Dec, 2009 1:36 pm

Sweet mercy... People really think walking in Tasmania is that easy? Surely Chapman must be to blame for this, he really doesnt explain just HOW HARD some of these walks are....

SCRATCH......Scrubmaster has been to Vanishing falls please listen to what he says.....

Re: Arthurs Traverse

Tue 08 Dec, 2009 1:38 pm

Yep, now listen to scrub master very carefully - he has been to the Falls, I haven't;
please walk within your limits / experience / capabilities & don't become another rescue statistic.

Re: Arthurs Traverse

Tue 08 Dec, 2009 2:45 pm

Ah, sorry guys, was never going to go all the way to vanishing falls. Just interested in comments I'd get considering the rant discussion going on since yesterday's news. Having been off-track in SW before, I understand how quickly you can slow down.

The offer of a lift still stands.

Re: Arthurs Traverse

Tue 08 Dec, 2009 2:48 pm

scratch wrote:Ah, sorry guys, was never going to go all the way to vanishing falls. Just interested in comments I'd get considering the rant discussion going on since yesterday's news. Having been off-track in SW before, I understand how quickly you can slow down.

The offer of a lift still stands.



uh-huh

Re: Arthurs Traverse

Tue 08 Dec, 2009 3:03 pm

When this thread came up I thought - 'Here we go, joined today'.
Whats your take on all this then Scratch?
Did you find out about the Forum via the mention in the paper?
Welcome

Re: Arthurs Traverse

Tue 08 Dec, 2009 4:02 pm

Hi Geoskid, and thanks.

No, found out about this in the forum, I was interested to see how he went up new river.

Not too much to say, really, except perhaps wait and see what breminator has to say. He asked the right questions, people gave the right answers, really, but it was a little "good luck but it might be hard" at the start, and "I told you so" at the end from some people. Nice to see a strong "don't do that!" responce after my post :-)

Personally, I think good on him. The plan seemed reasonable enough, and others agreed before hand. I don't think the argument should go anywhere near the cost of rescues etc on this occasion. At least he wasn't a politician, on his own, in the snow, not mentioning anyone in particular ;-)

Re: Arthurs Traverse

Tue 08 Dec, 2009 5:11 pm

Actually scratch there were a few people who tried to mention to Brem he may have been taking on a bit too much too soon, but how do you say more without being offensive, maybe we should have been a bit more offensive.

Re: Arthurs Traverse

Tue 08 Dec, 2009 5:26 pm

Thanks! And no offence taken.
Post a reply