Thanks again everyone

Phil those maps are great, thanks! Sharon, I've trolled through the lakepedder.org website but I hadn't spotted the youtube clip so thank you, I've never seen footage of the old lake!
The further into this project I get the deeper it seems to go. The Lake Pedder history is only one of about half dozen major issues I have to research and alone it's turning into something of a blackhole... Oh well, it's turning into quite an interesting subject

If anyone is interested in the project I'll continue to post work here throughout the year.
JamesMc wrote:Isn't "wilderness architecture" a contradiction, like "American intelligence", "German humour" or "English cuisine"?
JamesMc
Firstly, thanks for your suggestion of contacting the Lands Department.
Yes, wilderness architecture can be a contradiction of terms and to be honest usually is. But then, in the context of my site at Scotts Peak Dam, would you actually call it wilderness? If you regard wilderness as landscape untouched by human influence, then it certainly isn't. Beyond the obvious impact made by the Lake Pedder dams and the local quarries developed to build them, you also have a century of impact from bushwalkers, prospectors and explorers (think erosion, pollution from human waste and the introduction
Phytophthora to begin with), and several millennia of land management by the indigenous population.
I don't mean to say that a project in the area wouldn't need to be sensative to the natural place, of course it would, but I am interested in exploring the potential for architecture in wild places to be a positive element of its environment, rather than a violent intrusion. Naturally, I may find that there
shouldn't be built works in these areas, but then that's the purpose of the project