
Southern buttress of Mt Ossa by nickthetasmaniac, on Flickr
Cheers, Nick

corvus wrote:What about Ossa Minor ?![]()
corvus
PeterJ wrote:I like the idea of Connell Bluff after the Connells who had so to do with the overland
tas-man wrote:PeterJ wrote:I like the idea of Connell Bluff after the Connells who had so to do with the overland
That's a great idea! Does anyone know the process to submit such a proposal to the appropriate state authorities for consideration? Perhaps the members of this forum could be the recommending body for this.
ILUVSWTAS wrote:I believe a letter to the Nomanclature board is all it takes??
Nuts wrote:I had only even seen it called a bluff on here, i think of a bluff as a cliff ending to a plateau or ridge.
tas-man wrote:One avenue for requesting a new name is a record of usage, so if we decide on a name and start using it, then this will be evidence to support such a proposal.![]()
"Guiding Principles for the Assignment of Place Names
...Personal names are not acceptable unless it is in the public interest to honour a person by applying his/her name to an appropriate geographical feature.
frenchy_84 wrote:Surveyors bluff, can honor all the pioneering surveyors that slogged through tas wilderness...
Nuts wrote:?....... I would name it Sargents.. .....Eric :
Nuts wrote:Bush walk.com lol. Tbh while the Connels are legendary I would name it Sargents.. Er.. Part.
Eric must have climbed it many more times than anyone else (over 300 times since the 30's..so go the legends). Many here would never have heard of him, does he count?
PeterJ wrote:Nuts wrote:?....... I would name it Sargents.. .....Eric :
I assume he is still alive, I think they will not accept a name unless the person is deceased.
jmac wrote:I believe there's a strong argument for minimising assignment of new names to features in the wilderness. Each time something extra is named it arguably erodes the wilderness values of the area.
In a remote area with very little use, I'd possibly agree. However given the level of use and infrastructure on the Overland Track generally and in Pinestone Valley specifically, I'd question the 'wilderness' tag. Also, arguing that the lack of a name makes something wilderness seems a bit like sticking your head in the sand to me. Dozens of people walk past this feature every day during season - having a name won't change that.
When I was programming occasional walks to it as Walks Secretary of LWC 20-odd (?) years ago, it was commonly known amongst members as Mt. Ossa South. Surely that will still suffice?
Isn't that assigning a name?
jmac wrote:The reason "people walk past" is that it doesn't have a name. Name it, and a greater proportion will begin to climb it.
jmac wrote:I believe there's a strong argument for minimising assignment of new names to features in the wilderness.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests