
tasadam wrote:Interesting perspective. Would be interested to hear Parks opinion of that. Surely if it were the case, the environmental scar can be minimized significantly by some track work and "no-go regen areas" similar to what has been done in other areas.ILUVSWTAS wrote:Surely Ossa is now along side Cradle, Hartz, Mt Field... as in it's a sacraficial peak to give to the people in order to save others?? EVERYONE goes up Ossa....
On that subject, what about that new bridge crossing the creek on the way to Kitchen Hut! Whoa...... I went up to just beyond Kitchen Hut last Thursday with a friend who was doing some food drops, we were walking along chatting then I spotted it and swore mid-sentence...
The pretty pics are great, and as some of us are lucky to have experienced, many of these places are for the realm of the "highly experienced bushwalker only" (quoting the guidebooks).
As such, please consider being mindful of posting exact locations here if you think it prudent. There's no specific rule against it, and we're not trying to make it exclusive or anything, but there are a number of additional factors to consider when camping in some of these locations, not least of which is the sensitivity of the environment. So perhaps a less descriptive name like "on another mountain in central Tas" would suit better?
Ossa is just one example, okay to visit as a day trip if you felt inclined, but definitely not a good enviro for the average overland-trekker to consider as an extra stop!
My list includes a heap, but rather than name them I'll dig out some photos when I next fire up that computer.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests