Strider wrote:Much nicer outdoors than the Warm versions IMO
Travis22 wrote:Your the first person ive ever heard say they prefer cool white to warm 'outdoors' Strider(and by outdoors im assuming you mean in the bush).
Personally i prefer neutral to warm everywhere but i do understand some people like cool white in urban area where they is quite a bit of artificial light already present but in the 'bush' away from the city lights... no question! Warm or high CRI all the way
Travis.
forest wrote:Great little light, the "F" is very nice, enjoyed not having my eyes focus on the hot spot of the regular beam when trail running last night. Pumped up to full power the H52 has some sting, more that I thought it would. Plenty to clearly spot track juntions etc from 20odd meters away as I pelted down the trails. Most of the run was just in H2 as it was plenty of light.
forest wrote:I forget the brand of my 18650's but they are 3100mah and they weigh 45 grams each.
IMO Phil the H600 would be more light than you would want (Especially if going UL) for general bushwalking and camp chores, unless you like heaps of light or really, really long run times.
If your planning extended night walkings, caving, longer distance animal watching etc, The H600 would be a good option then.
Travis22 wrote:Definitely something wrong there in the specs, the new 3400 unprotected cells are definitely thicker then the older 3100 unprotected cells.
You won't have any issues fitting any version of an unprotected 18650 into any 18650 Zebralight it's the protected versions you need to watch.
The older 3100mAh unprotected cells I have measure 18.2 at the thickest point near the + end and 18.07 for the rest of the cell.
Travis.
Return to Ultralight backpacking
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 3 guests