Kinsayder wrote:The transition to lightweight (or ultralight) hiking is, in many ways, quite liberating. It all adds up, which is obvious, but the thoughts of necessity and luxury start whirling about. Do I, don't I? All of that. Of course there is a point where it would be reckless not to take certain things but all long as you're safe, going much lighter is great. There is some wonderful equipment out there that help facilitate this too. I'm mostly quite busy so only get to hike maybe four times a year but my last hike was a December Razorback with around 12kgs in a 35 litre pack, bliss!
Glad that you're getting into it Dugsuth, enjoy!
Dale wrote:Less and lighter gear translates to more wine on the trail.
jackhinde wrote:Dale wrote:Less and lighter gear translates to more wine on the trail.
or alternatively rum.... which is for the real weight concious alco's
you may find the lightweight challenge an addictive and expensive exercise, i have paid silly amounts of money on shedding a few grams.
Appropriate caution, WarrenH.WarrenH wrote:I am not an ultra-lighter not on Kosciuszko's Main Range or in any part of the High Country .....
Light footwear (runners, KT26, etc) can work on tracked walks but, for me, mandatory is full leather boots and knee-high gaiters when I go off-track – foot and ankle support, snakes, protection from rocks and sharp sticks.under10kg wrote:you can wear runners that are 320 gms or so
BTW, I survived the trip with just the head of my toothbrush – not trimmed for weight-saving, but it snapped on day 1 – of course, had to carry the handle to the end anyway !WarrenH wrote:I frequently repackage things more efficiently, but chopping a toothbrush?
Ha, not at all – Zen-like calm, that’s me :))John Sheridan wrote:Tooth brushing MAKE bernieq ANGRy, GRRRRRRRRRRRRRR, snap :p
Return to Bushwalking Discussion
Users browsing this forum: andrewp, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 44 guests