Thu 02 Aug, 2012 11:21 pm
Thu 09 Aug, 2012 9:01 am
doogs wrote:Brisbane is up there too with some great walks; Glasshouse mountains, Lamington NP, Springbrook NP, Moreton Island, Mt Barney NP and down to Mt Warning. All within a coupla hours of the big smokeHobart is way out in front of the others though Mt Coot-tha V Mt Wellington, no contest really
Thu 09 Aug, 2012 6:02 pm
mjdalessa wrote:Probably Hobart. It troubles me what mainlanders will classify as a wilderness area e.g. a large camp ground with a river next to it 2mins from the road had a wilderness area sign in the Port Stephens area.You'd be luck to get 1km from a road in that particualr wilderness area
Areas like Mt. Direction and the Meehan Range which are poor by Tasmanian standards quite easily trump this where wilderness is concerned and they're pretty much within the city limits.
Thu 09 Aug, 2012 6:07 pm
Turfa wrote:Nice one............. But then again, it troubles me what Tasmanians will classify as a city !
Fri 10 Aug, 2012 1:13 am
Fri 10 Aug, 2012 2:24 pm
Sat 11 Aug, 2012 9:32 am
tas-man wrote:doogs wrote:Brisbane is up there too with some great walks; Glasshouse mountains, Lamington NP, Springbrook NP, Moreton Island, Mt Barney NP and down to Mt Warning. All within a coupla hours of the big smokeHobart is way out in front of the others though Mt Coot-tha V Mt Wellington, no contest really
As a born and bred Brisbanite growing up in Holland Park, my teenage playgrounds were Mt Gravatt 185m, and Mt Cootha 220m which I thought were BIG mountains to explore. I have now lived at a height of 180m overlooking the Tamar River and Mt's Arthur, Barrow, and Ben Lomond all over 1000m for eighteen years now, and am always taken aback when visiting Brisbane at how flat it all now seems! However walking along the Main Range and in Lamington NP are different types of experiences to Tassie, and each city has its unique character - but from Launceston I can escape to beaches or mountains within an hour or two.
Sat 11 Aug, 2012 10:21 am
Sat 11 Aug, 2012 11:40 am
Strider wrote:185m is hardly even a hill, let alone a mountain!
I grew up in NZ. Tassie mountains look small to me
Sat 11 Aug, 2012 12:40 pm
Mark F wrote:Doogs, in Hobart I lived in Battery Point so transport of some sort was needed or you added a hour or so to reach Wellington. Within the 5km I could have lived in many spots on the Eastern Shore which also would require transport to reach some good walking.
Sat 11 Aug, 2012 1:24 pm
Strider wrote:tas-man wrote:As a born and bred Brisbanite growing up in Holland Park, my teenage playgrounds were Mt Gravatt 185m, and Mt Cootha 220m which I thought were BIG mountains to explore. <snip>
185m is hardly even a hill, let alone a mountain!
I grew up in NZ. Tassie mountains look small to me
Tue 14 Aug, 2012 7:24 pm
stepbystep wrote:I'd love it if the train line to Mt Field/Maydena was still operating...
Fri 07 Dec, 2012 11:54 pm
Sat 08 Dec, 2012 6:25 am
Strick wrote:Poor old Melbourne!
I don't see many people rushing to defend her honour in the face of some stiff bushwalking competition!
Is it really the poor relation to the other state capitals when it comes to accessing wild places?
Where do bushwalking Melbournites head to when they want to get out there?
...
However, Melbourne is probably the best city in Australia (runs for cover...!)
Sun 09 Dec, 2012 10:26 am
Strick wrote:Where do bushwalking Melbournites head to when they want to get out there?
© Bushwalk Australia and contributors 2007-2013.