Sat 31 Jan, 2009 9:31 pm
Sat 31 Jan, 2009 10:17 pm
Sun 01 Feb, 2009 6:53 pm
Sun 01 Feb, 2009 9:17 pm
Nuts wrote:I guess that in reality, i'd end up with a similar weight to Corvus, though I do recognise that a similar level of safety (perhaps not comfort) could be achieved with far less.
Mon 02 Feb, 2009 11:16 am
Darren wrote:G'Day Nuts
If you are happy and fit enough to carry 34 kg on your back you could try lowering your base hiking weight to 10kg then you would have enough left over for a carton and some ice.![]()
Just a thought
Darren
Mon 02 Feb, 2009 11:18 am
corvus wrote:
Apart from the obvious "luxury items" what would you ditch if you had to and still be really safe
Mon 02 Feb, 2009 12:19 pm
Mon 02 Feb, 2009 12:19 pm
Mon 02 Feb, 2009 5:19 pm
Nuts wrote:corvus wrote:
Apart from the obvious "luxury items" what would you ditch if you had to and still be really safe
Hi Corvus: I choose not to answer (further) on the grounds that I may incriminate () myself
Wed 04 Feb, 2009 9:04 am
, I originally thought that you have no interest in going lightweight. You where knocking my gear and it was obvious that you have not even seen the gear though know how it performs but then I realised that you where weighing your gear and now you are aware of how much everything weighs in your pack and that is the start of becoming a lightweight walker, congratulations, you have made the first step, the rest will follow, maybe slowly but it will happen. I have looked at your gear list there are bits of gear and things to do that I could suggest to reduce your weight but that is with my views in mind and as we know we look at things in a different way and it is something that you will have to tailor to your needs. Some advice is to ignore what others think and do what you want.seems to me it was just to stir the pot
sthughes wrote:Tony,
Okay I'm sorry for doubting how incredibly robust and warm your fantastic lightweight gear is compared to our antiquated stuff. I guess you're right and I'm just too stupid to do whats best for me. I will be into the local outdoor shop tomorrow to check out a coat like yours, I could do with something lighter than my stupid heavy jacket that is no more durable anyway. I was only dubious of it's off track survivability because a retailer was describing it as ideal for "low abrasion environments". And I was only unsure of the warmth of the quilt becaause Backpacklight themselves say "The Backpacking Light UL 180 Quilt can be used as the core component of a three-season sleep system when combined with Cocoon clothing, or by itself for summer backpacking in mild climates". At least you have put me right now and I can move on to an enlightened future.I look forward to finding its limits
I don't want to find the limits of my gear - I think that sums up our differences nicley.
Okay I'm sorry for doubting how incredibly robust and warm your fantastic lightweight gear is compared to our antiquated stuff. I guess you're right and I'm just too stupid to do whats best for me.
I will be into the local outdoor shop tomorrow to check out a coat like yours
I could do with something lighter than my stupid heavy jacket that is no more durable anyway. I was only dubious of it's off track survivability because a retailer was describing it as ideal for "low abrasion environments"
And I was only unsure of the warmth of the quilt becaause Backpacklight themselves say "The Backpacking Light UL 180 Quilt can be used as the core component of a three-season sleep system when combined with Cocoon clothing, or by itself for summer backpacking in mild climates"
I look forward to finding its limits
I don't want to find the limits of my gear - I think that sums up our differences nicley.
Wed 04 Feb, 2009 9:22 am
Wed 04 Feb, 2009 1:20 pm
Nuts wrote:Tony, I have some Marmot Precip jackets (and the Oracle (reinforced precip.).
They are a well made jacket though don't 'breathe' at all and I wouldn't trust them off-track.
Good on trails and as a lightweight option when rain is a possibility, not a given.
Ended up back with Goretex, would probably give the eVent a go if buying now.
Dearer than the lighter (eg. single layer/precip) options though..
Still using precip.(oracle) pants- though have done much 'patching'...
BTW- That extreme w'proof tape works well for this.
Wed 04 Feb, 2009 1:45 pm
Wed 04 Feb, 2009 7:29 pm
Thu 05 Feb, 2009 12:33 pm
Nuts wrote:I personally use a paclite jacket I believe it is better (though not perfect).
I have used that tape (bought from mitre10) on many of the pants (they come apart down low where boots are forced through them (without unzipping)) The tape will stay on thru washer/drier
and is an easy fix.
Fri 06 Feb, 2009 8:56 pm
Son of a Beach wrote:Penguin wrote:Maybe we could set up a spread sheet with a full list and everybody put their weights against that list. A bit hard as we all carry different elements to our stoves (ie with or without windshields). There are other examples of what some consider essentials (first aid kits, vodka) and others seem to get by without.
Also with a rating for how off track you are going, and over how many people you are sharing weight.
It could be a fun exercise.
My next BWT project will actually make this possible all on the BWT site. It's not the purpose of the project, but an off-shoot of it. I'll post more details when it's a bit further along in development. It will be some time away from completion yet (only really started in earnest about a week ago), so if you guys want to do a spreadsheet in the meantime, don't hold back.
Mon 16 Feb, 2009 7:22 pm
Tue 17 Feb, 2009 4:08 pm
© Bushwalk Australia and contributors 2007-2013.