Sun 30 Jun, 2013 9:40 pm
Ent wrote:Just wish that the type 2000 hogwash would die a natural death.
Sun 30 Jun, 2013 9:41 pm
bernieq wrote:I suspect the hogwash "typ. 2000 mAh, min 1900 mAh" actually means : typical 2000 mAh, minimum 1900 mAh.
It's saying that these batteries will have a capacity of at least 1900 mAh and will usually have a capacity close to 2000 mAh.
Mon 01 Jul, 2013 7:51 pm
bernieq wrote:Thanks, Ent, for the research, albeit on a small sample. It accords, mostly, with what I've experienced with my GPS - in order of time to discharge : Sanyo, Varta, Eveready and Duracell - however, the best I've experienced has been with a Chinese brand "Pure Energy".
BTW,Ent wrote:Just wish that the type 2000 hogwash would die a natural death.
I suspect the hogwash "typ. 2000 mAh, min 1900 mAh" actually means : typical 2000 mAh, minimum 1900 mAh.
It's saying that these batteries will have a capacity of at least 1900 mAh and will usually have a capacity close to 2000 mAh.
Mon 01 Jul, 2013 8:35 pm
Ent wrote:The worst batteries outside cheap non name ones are the Duracell.
Tue 02 Jul, 2013 12:07 am
Strider wrote:Ent wrote:The worst batteries outside cheap non name ones are the Duracell.
Apparently the white-topped Duracell NiMH's are rebranded Eneloops ("Duraloops").
Tue 02 Jul, 2013 8:35 am
Ent wrote:Strider wrote:Ent wrote:The worst batteries outside cheap non name ones are the Duracell.
Apparently the white-topped Duracell NiMH's are rebranded Eneloops ("Duraloops").
So am I correct the Duracell just rebrands batteries and is not a developer and manufacturer of batteries?
Wed 17 Jul, 2013 11:22 am
Wed 17 Jul, 2013 11:53 am
Franco wrote:Just spotted the new Eneloop line up.
Now the AA and AAA come in three types.
http://www.eneloop.info/eneloop-product ... eries.html
Wed 17 Jul, 2013 3:03 pm
© Bushwalk Australia and contributors 2007-2013.