by slparker » Wed 25 Jun, 2014 11:23 am
In Tasmania:
South-west track, definitely, although the track went south of the ironbound range, not over. There were tracks following the coast up to NW tas and possibly somewhat inland as well as george Augustus Robinson went inland to the Athur range (and climbed a peak in the arthurs) when he was searching for aboriginal bands in the 1830s.
Overland track, probably - there are archeological deposits up both the mersey and Forth rivers as well as along the northern rim of the tiers. Local legend tells of it but I have not read of any evidence of an aboriginal track. trappers used tracks up from the valleys in the 188002/1900s into the western tiers which, it is reasonable to assume, followed established tracks by aborigines, since there is archeological evidence of occupation.
lake highway and over the western tiers down to bothwell was an aboriginal track (now a road, of course)
from the midlands past dry's bluff to the gog range was a track
along the base of the tiers, up the lake river (behind Miller's bluff) to den hill and interlaken
down the present interlaken road, across the midlands and up the eastern tiers to Tooms lake and down the coal river to the coast were aboriginal roads as well.
From what i understand there were open areas kept clear of bush by burning that weren't specifically tracks but were migratory pathways/hunting grounds - and they pretty much were consistent with today's major settled areas. An exception is the south-west, which shows evidence of burning and long occupation by aboriginal tasmanians but has no substantial settlement now.
Controversially, it's pretty much a fiction that there is any wilderness in tasmania. Wild, yes, but untouched by human hand or occupation - no.