Mon 01 Dec, 2014 12:27 pm
maddog wrote:Most surprising is how few people seem to suffer from the same complaints when exposed to a campfire...
Mon 01 Dec, 2014 1:07 pm
maddog wrote:The expectation that smokers should be shunted off to one side seems remarkably rude and does nothing to further pleasant conversation amongst friends.
While extending sympathy to the hypersensitive, and those of poor health, it is surprising how selective such allergies can appear at times. Most surprising is how few people seem to suffer from the same complaints when exposed to a campfire.
Mon 01 Dec, 2014 1:23 pm
maddog wrote:G'day vicrev,
Smokers more than pay their way. The taxes they pay are more than sufficient to pay their medical bills and they (often) die earlier so do not become a drain on the public purse in old age.
On wowsers (a term that describes a person who seeks to deprive others of behaviour deemed to be immoral or "sinful" or alternatively a ineffably pious person who mistakes this world for a penitentiary and himself for a warden), there is plenty of material out there. Before he got silly, Padraic McGunniess had a few interesting ideas to contribute, including this piece. Also worth a read is The Rise of the Green Wowser.
Cheers,
Maddog.
But their [e.g. anti-tobacco campaigners] chief motivation is not, of course, the good of humanity or the health of the community but a mean-spirited puritanism. . .
No doubt such creatures exist, but you have not shown how they are influencing the (serious) debate on tobacco.ineffably pious person who mistakes this world for a penitentiary and himself for a warden.
Mon 01 Dec, 2014 1:26 pm
Mon 01 Dec, 2014 1:43 pm
Mon 01 Dec, 2014 3:04 pm
Mon 01 Dec, 2014 3:43 pm
Mon 01 Dec, 2014 4:09 pm
Mon 01 Dec, 2014 4:33 pm
Mon 01 Dec, 2014 7:00 pm
neil_fahey wrote: But many non-smokers probably just need to chill out a bit, I think.
Mon 01 Dec, 2014 7:09 pm
Mon 01 Dec, 2014 7:56 pm
Mon 01 Dec, 2014 8:02 pm
Mon 01 Dec, 2014 8:33 pm
neil_fahey wrote:I completely agree with you that smokers need to be more considerate, as I've said a couple of times. i'm sorry if I appeared to be making light of your breathing issues. That was certainly not my intention. I was trying to make a point about everyone being more considerate, but it appears that in the process I've been inconsiderate myself. Should have put more thought into my comment. I apologise.
Wed 03 Dec, 2014 5:28 am
Wed 03 Dec, 2014 7:06 am
Wed 03 Dec, 2014 7:47 am
maddog wrote:And a good article on the nasty and petty persecution of smokers and the hypocrisy of anti-smokers here.
Wed 03 Dec, 2014 5:50 pm
Wed 03 Dec, 2014 6:56 pm
maddog wrote: Thankfully libertarians tend to prevail in the long run.
Wed 03 Dec, 2014 7:24 pm
Wed 03 Dec, 2014 7:53 pm
Wed 03 Dec, 2014 8:11 pm
Wed 03 Dec, 2014 8:43 pm
vicrev wrote:I thought this was a thread about cigarette butts.....I must be wrong........
Thu 04 Dec, 2014 8:09 am
Fri 05 Dec, 2014 1:09 pm
Sat 06 Dec, 2014 8:30 pm
Sat 06 Dec, 2014 8:48 pm
Sat 06 Dec, 2014 10:33 pm
Sun 07 Dec, 2014 6:22 am
Sun 07 Dec, 2014 7:58 am
maddog wrote:The freedom to smoke ought to be understood as a significant token of the class of freedoms, and when it is threatened one should look instantly for what other controls are being tightened, for what other checks on freedoms are being administered. The attitude of a society toward the freedom to smoke is a test of the way it understands the rights of people at large, for at any time, a quarter to a half of all the people in the world are puffing away at cigarettes.
© Bushwalk Australia and contributors 2007-2013.