ErichFromm wrote:I considered the core too. argument seemed to be "simple and reliable" vs "more functions and possible break points". not sure I went the right way....time will tell if I use a extra functions enough to justify the recharging and software glitches. would've loved sapphire face....
keithy wrote:All my Suunto Cores were negative display (white digits on black face), but I'd probably go with a positive display next time around.
keithy wrote:Can you change the datum on the Suunto Traverse? I haven't been following the Suunto Ambit firmware updates, but a complaint of the Ambits was that it didn't allow changing datums - although Suunto had said it would be possible with future firmware update.
Johnnie Walker wrote:Anyone using a Garmin Fenix 3 or Epix? They are quite expensive but are they worth it?
I don't have a watch or a GPS hence I consider them.
And, do overseas (northern hemisphere) Suunto and Garmin watches work (GPS) in Australia?
n5750547 wrote:I have been tossing up between the Traverse/Ambit3 and the Fenix3 and was leaning toward the Traverse mainly because if price. The above link has made me reconsider however and I might have to give the Fenix a go?
n5750547 wrote: Thanks for the heads up. Will definately have to suss out the warranty situation but I would probably just pay the extra $70 for peace of mind.
Travis22 wrote:I really wanted, still want the Traverse but i had to remind myself my primary focus was the fitness training (Cycling, Swimming and a little running). I pretty much found myself going straight to the 'top' to get a HR watch that i can use everywhere including swimming.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests