Tue 09 Mar, 2010 12:53 pm
Tony wrote:As for AARN style of packs (or Double packs as they are called in the research papers), the military have done a lot of research into them and as it has been suggested, they are the most energy efficient way of load carriage this is because the most efficient way of load carriage is to keep the load on your center of gravity and at least on flat terrain the double pack does this very well but according to the literature the double packs are not with out problems, (I have not used an AARN pack or even seen one, this information is from scientific research articles) in the reports that I have read about double packs some subjects report over heating, restricted breathing and in rugged terrain, view obstruction, however one study reported that "there was an percentage increase in march time when using the double pack, whatever the load" Thus 6% (light load); 14% (medium load) 28% (heavy load) (Charteris 2000).Tony
Tue 09 Mar, 2010 3:06 pm
under10kg wrote:(I have not used an AARN pack or even seen one, this information is from scientific research articles) in the reports that I have read about double packs some subjects report over heating, restricted breathing and in rugged terrain, view obstruction, however one study reported that "there was an percentage increase in march time when using the double pack, whatever the load
In my experince of using several Aarn pack models in Australia and New Zealand, the front balance pockets of Aarn packs do not overheat the body due to the internal frame system design. This holds the balance pockets away from the body and allows full air flow. These can be customised for woman with large busts.
When scrampling, one can undo an attachment to the balance pockets and move them out of the way for hard scrambling. This allows a full view of ones feet etc. Personally, I like the even front/back balance weight distribution when scrambling as you feel so much more balanced.
You need try an aarn pack to see how it makes load carring much more easy. They are a bit more of a fiddle to put on.
I am just reporting what I have read so far about double packs and I still have reservations about over heating with an Aarn pack, I have also read that this could be used to advantage in cold weather.( I am being totally honest about this even though Aarn is my brother so I could be accused of bias)
Tue 09 Mar, 2010 3:18 pm
photohiker wrote:
Beware. An aarn pack is not a 'double pack'
A classical double pack is just that. You put one pack on your back, and another on your front. There are system packs that allow you to add a pack to the front by attaching it to the main harness. I often see this type of loading on photography hikes I have been on, and it takes a very strong and fit individual to keep it up for long if there is any weight in the forward pack. There is high pressure on the shoulders, and the person wearing the packs has his breathing restricted and the airflow around their body eliminated. They overheat, and they cannot breathe adequately. Additionally, they cannot see their feet or the trail they are walking on. Might be ok in the military for short haul trips.
This is not in any way similar to an aarn pack, where the emphasis is to remove weight from the shoulders, place it on the hips, and to carry balancing pockets out the front and away from the body so that airflow is not restricted. Breathing is restricted less than with a standard pack as the upper body is not restricted by the harness. (watch someone's shoulders without a pack and breathing hard to see that shoulders are involved in breathing) The wearer still has full view of their feet and the trail.
Tue 09 Mar, 2010 4:10 pm
Tony wrote:I have recently been doing some research into backpacks or as the scientific circles call it "Load Carriage" with the idea of putting my findings together to start a similar discussion on bushwalk.com.
Tony
Tue 09 Mar, 2010 4:53 pm
Tony wrote:Hi photohike,
Unless you can prove otherwise I will have to disagree with you on this one.
A double pack is a just that a pack on the pack and a pack on the front whether it is supported on the shoulders, the hips of both and to me an Aarn pack comes under the double pack configuration. According to (S Legg Influence of backpack straps on pulmonary function) traditional backpacks can restrict breathing even with relatively light loads.
Tony
Tue 09 Mar, 2010 5:40 pm
Tue 09 Mar, 2010 6:31 pm
pinarello wrote:I agree with scavenger in thinking it is basically a mental or psychological thing. women get told their whole life that they cannot carry this, that they need help when lifting that.
Wed 10 Mar, 2010 6:59 am
ninjapuppet wrote:
thats great tony. I dont know if you've come across this, but the university of SA school of physiotherapy ran several studies of backpacks about 10 years ago. I used to help them collect data on school kids over a period of 5 years, and many studies were conducted from that data set. its mainly based on school kids but you might be able to find some really good background info on backpacks from some of those studies, such as how the spine reacts to differnet loads, and what vertabrea level is optimal for the backpack's center of gravity to be located at. just try to google unisa backpack studies
heres one such study
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC111061/
Wed 10 Mar, 2010 7:29 am
photohiker wrote:Tony wrote:Hi photohiker,
Unless you can prove otherwise I will have to disagree with you on this one.
A double pack is a just that a pack on the pack and a pack on the front whether it is supported on the shoulders, the hips of both and to me an Aarn pack comes under the double pack configuration. According to (S Legg Influence of backpack straps on pulmonary function) traditional backpacks can restrict breathing even with relatively light loads.
Tony
Well, I can offer the initial proof that I have personal experience of all three types of pack personally: Normal, double, and Aarn. You say you have not even seen an aarn pack, so I would expect to have a small benefit of doubt, but up to you.
I can assure you that a double pack and an aarn pack are very different beasts as already described.
Have you any links to the double pack research you speak of?
Wed 10 Mar, 2010 8:20 am
Tony wrote:Hi photohiker,I can assure you that a double pack and an aarn pack are very different beasts as already described.
From pictures and descriptions they look the same to me.Have you any links to the double pack research you speak of?
Here is one for starters http://eprints.ru.ac.za/669/
I have many papers that mention double packs but unfortunately they are not available to the general net user, (I work at a university and have access to some but not all, some are available only if you pay)
Tony
Wed 10 Mar, 2010 1:32 pm
Wed 10 Mar, 2010 4:21 pm
under10kg wrote:I send Aarn a copy of this thread as it would be good for some input from the designer of these packs. Seeing a picture of these packs and actually trying out one are 2 different things. Hopefully he will respond in time. Just for the record I do not use an Aarn pack when doing short walks, but use a frame less pack and light gear.
Sat 13 Mar, 2010 8:06 pm
Sun 14 Mar, 2010 8:58 pm
Taurë-rana wrote:I walked up Mt Montgomery today with 22kg in my pack which is about 43% of my body weight. It hurt like going up any mountain used to before I got fitter, and I stopped fairly often, but I took 1 hour and 50 minutes there and back and the "official" time for the return walk is 1.5 or 2 hours depending on where you look. I was pleased to find that once I got to the top and took the pack off, I felt fine, and now I'm OK, but have twinges in a couple of muscles. A 2 hour walk is one thing, but I think that unless I keep training over short distances with that sort of weight I would be asking for trouble carrying it on a long trip. However I suspect that with continuing training this would change. This is nothing to do with "Oh, I'm carrying that much, it must be too much" but more to do with just how my muscles felt carrying that sort of weight.
I really don't think I could have carried that weight as easily if I had a normal pack - being able to walk upright with very little pull on the shoulders makes things much easier. The only place I felt the weight was in the leg muscles which were pushing me up or holding me back coming down. I don't feel any restriction on my breathing with the Aarn pack but it probably is a bit warmer. I wouldn't say it's a huge amount though.
As a consequence of that little training walk I'm going to try to keep my total pack weight under 18kg for my next walk, so hopefully I'll be able to enjoy the walk without just enduring it. 15kg would be even better of course, and "under 10kg" would be wonderful, but then I'd freeze to death!
By the way, I have no association with Aarn, but want to give credit where it's due.
Sun 14 Mar, 2010 9:34 pm
corvus wrote:T-a,
With respect 22kg for a couple of hours even at your weight and age is doable however add a couple or three hours and you will find your limits(with any sort of pack) especially when you have no choice but to go on as people are depending on you.
So I would bear in mind that 30% of bodyweight should be your maximum targeted pack weight ,looking at ways to reduce this without compromising comfort and safety![]()
corvus
© Bushwalk Australia and contributors 2007-2013.