Competitions, photo games, and other forum hosted games.
Forum rules
Only administrators may post new topics to this forum. Registered users can post replies.
Sun 01 Sep, 2024 2:37 pm
north-north-west wrote:Thank you. I thought this one was going to last another week.
Sorry, I'm away.
Where am I camped? Next to a track
- Attachments
-

- Byron Gap on a very cold morning
Last edited by
Last on Mon 02 Sep, 2024 8:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
Mon 02 Sep, 2024 12:03 am
Byron Gap?
Mon 02 Sep, 2024 8:05 am
eggs wrote:Byron Gap?
Correct
Mon 02 Sep, 2024 3:23 pm
A bit lucky given the little detail, but I have been there twice.
Next
Mon 02 Sep, 2024 4:03 pm
Fisher Bluff?
Mon 02 Sep, 2024 11:59 pm
Not Fisher Bluff
Tue 03 Sep, 2024 7:48 am
I think we could be back on the Jukes complex. Maybe looking back at Proprietary? There's definitely a big bit of water high on the right which may be Burbury; smaller wet bits on the left, with a road ... could be one of the other minor lumps in view, although that is a large cairn, and Proprietary is the only peak up there with one ... I think ... although I don't recall it having a post but it has been a few years, and I also don't recall being able to see what looks like either buildiings or mineworks or something siimilar ...
Blech, I have too much to do today to get caught up in this.
Tue 03 Sep, 2024 12:52 pm
Yes - this is Proprietary in view on the climb of Jukes. The tailing dam at Queenstown may be a bit more recent.
Tue 03 Sep, 2024 5:21 pm
It certainly makes the drop from Proprietary look deadly.
Where was this:
- Attachments
-

Tue 03 Sep, 2024 10:54 pm
The Thumbs?
Wed 04 Sep, 2024 12:44 am
are you on Tyndall looking at Geikie and Sedgwick?
Wed 04 Sep, 2024 7:32 am
Nowhere near the Tyndalls.
eggs is on the right track, although I still had a way to go ... again, too busy today to drag this out. It's on Packer Spur.
Wed 04 Sep, 2024 7:59 am
In case anyone's wondering:
http://www.bonzle.com/c/a?a=p&p=25735&cmd=sp&lstt=1Next to the Gordon Dam (not "Lake"). Took me a while to find it.
Wed 04 Sep, 2024 10:18 am
The best place to find Tasmanian locations is ListMap:
https://maps.thelist.tas.gov.au/listmap/app/list/map
Wed 04 Sep, 2024 10:32 am
Cool.
Makes you wonder about the person who one day literally called those dams lakes. Either extremely stupid, or an absolute weasel.
Wed 04 Sep, 2024 1:09 pm
Yes - Thumbs was a rough and general guess given your foreground.
Next
Wed 04 Sep, 2024 2:17 pm
swhite wrote:Cool.
Makes you wonder about the person who one day literally called those dams lakes. Either extremely stupid, or an absolute weasel.
Various HEC flunkies.
Many of them are grossly enlarged versions of actual pre-existing lakes. Even
yingina/Great Lake has been dammed to control and harness its catchment. And technically some are impoundments (Fake Pedder, for instance). Some were (and still are) marvels of engineering, but at far too high a cost (and I don't mean the $$$ involved).
To conservationists and environmentalists, the Hydro-Electric Commission was the 1914 to 1983 version of today's Sustainable (no, they aren't being sarcastic) Timber Tasmania (formerly known as Forestry Tasmania, or ... well, given those initials, I probably don't need to spell out the word that usually [and accurately] replaced "Forestry") - the true political power in the state and a blight on all decency, fairness and common sense.
And I better stop there before I get sanctioned for getting all political ...
Wed 04 Sep, 2024 3:06 pm
swhite wrote:Cool.
Makes you wonder about the person who one day literally called those dams lakes. Either extremely stupid, or an absolute weasel.
Having been worked with the Nomenclature Board on behalf of my former employer to name (and rename) several bodies of dammed water in Tasmania (not Hydro), I've discovered that the Nomenclature Board (or Placenames Tasmania, as they're now called) do have some good reasons for this. One of the reasons that tripped us up in the organisation I used to work for is that the Nomenclature Board wanted to have names for both the dam wall and for the body of water being held behind the dam wall, but the names must be distinct - not the same name for both features.
In our case, we opted to call the wall "X Dam" and the water body either "Lake X", "X Lake" or "X Reservoir" (depending on a few other factors).
So as much as I don't always like those names, I can see some logic behind it.
Clear naming is important for many reasons. When it comes to water bodies, one of the considerations is that emergency services may want to know the specifics of water bodies in emergency situations in order to extract water for fire-fighting purposes.
Wed 04 Sep, 2024 4:07 pm
Thx. X Dam and X Reservoir sounds like an honest solution. I'm not on-board (ahem) with Lake.
Wed 04 Sep, 2024 4:10 pm
north-north-west wrote:swhite wrote:Cool.
Makes you wonder about the person who one day literally called those dams lakes. Either extremely stupid, or an absolute weasel.
Various HEC flunkies.
Many of them are grossly enlarged versions of actual pre-existing lakes. Even
yingina/Great Lake has been dammed to control and harness its catchment. And technically some are impoundments (Fake Pedder, for instance). Some were (and still are) marvels of engineering, but at far too high a cost (and I don't mean the $$$ involved).
To conservationists and environmentalists, the Hydro-Electric Commission was the 1914 to 1983 version of today's Sustainable (no, they aren't being sarcastic) Timber Tasmania (formerly known as Forestry Tasmania, or ... well, given those initials, I probably don't need to spell out the word that usually [and accurately] replaced "Forestry") - the true political power in the state and a blight on all decency, fairness and common sense.
And I better stop there before I get sanctioned for getting all political ...
Understand, agree, and not expanding the timber topic, due to time and place.
Wed 04 Sep, 2024 5:19 pm
north-north-west wrote:Sustainable (no, they aren't being sarcastic) Timber Tasmania (formerly known as Forestry Tasmania
A quick 2c while we're off-topic, hoping not to totally derail the game: I was told recently by what should be a reliable source that STT is just a name for marketing purposes. It's still legally Forestry Tasmania.
Wed 04 Sep, 2024 7:07 pm
Schnells Ridge?
Wed 04 Sep, 2024 7:24 pm
Yes Last
Thu 05 Sep, 2024 12:42 am
Thanks eggs, been there twice, never seen the view. Next
- Attachments
-

- Mt Murchison
Last edited by
Last on Thu 05 Sep, 2024 12:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Thu 05 Sep, 2024 10:52 am
Mount Murchison?
Thu 05 Sep, 2024 10:59 am
teak wrote:Mount Murchison?
Correct
Thu 05 Sep, 2024 11:31 am
Thank you, where was I in this photo?
- Attachments
-

- Looking South South East from Mount Pillinger.
Last edited by
teak on Fri 06 Sep, 2024 1:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Fri 06 Sep, 2024 12:54 pm
Pillinger?
Fri 06 Sep, 2024 1:10 pm
Yes it is Mount Pillinger.
Fri 06 Sep, 2024 1:13 pm
Thanks teak.
Next...
- Attachments
-

- Twin Spires from Lee's Paddocks - Kia Ora route
Last edited by
Geevesy on Sat 07 Sep, 2024 1:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
© Bushwalk Australia and contributors 2007-2013.