
We went up Moss Ridge and did the infamous mud wall scramble only to find that there was a route around it. I don't know if things are the same but it's worth checking before you claw your way up the mud.
Taurë-rana wrote:I led a trip up Fedder about 20 years ago, and found a gully on the way to the summit scarier than the exposed face as it was slippery. The exposed face is very grippy with ledges and only a problem if you step back - you die, which has happened. We had 3 Tasmanians and 1 mainlander in our party, the 3 Tasmanians were all OK with the exposure without ropes, the mainlander was not as happy.
We went up Moss Ridge and did the infamous mud wall scramble only to find that there was a route around it. I don't know if things are the same but it's worth checking before you claw your way up the mud.
tandles wrote:I'm thinking of planning a trip to fed peak this summer. I will be travelling with folks that may want to use a rope.
What length of rope would folks reccommend for protecting parts of the direct acent/descent route? Would 20m be enough?
Has anyone used climbing protection on the route and if so what type?
Is it possible to just use slings on bollards or do you need to take a set of nuts?
whynotwalk wrote: ... but a few years back I posted a series of pieces about climbing Federation on my blog.
bluewombat wrote:I am curious to know from anyone who has used climbing gear on the normal route up Fedders, what type of belay anchors you used, hexs, chocks, cams etc and whether you can recall sizes. What length of rope did you use, a normal 50 or something shorter. PM me if you would prefer
bw
tandles wrote:Still keen to hear from anyone who has used a rope and gear to protected the route.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests