I'm heroically refraining from offering a comment...



wayno wrote:technology wise theres differences between macpac and kathmandu,
macpac made the break from gore tex and went with the superior waterproof breathable membrane eVent
i wouldnt compare items like kathmandu packs with macpac ones. kathmandu ones are pretty minimalist in design , macpacs are a lot more robust and water resistant.
I'd favour macpac tents and sleeping bags as well for design and robustness.
macpac have provided pretty good after sales service no matter how old the gear,
on the whole i've found kathmandu to be more variable in quality than macpac.
slparker wrote:Whilst we're Kathmandu bashing.... my goretex jacket bought in the mid-nineties started leaking (probably a gore-tex fault) the sales dude from kathmandu said I'll get it looked at... 1 month later I had a new goretex jacket with a better spec (by far) than my previous one (free of charge on the gore-tex warranty). That was Kathmandu in perth WA. Now I agree that a lot of their stuff is c..p and that they are squarely aimed at the traveller market, but I was impressed with my service at that one shop back in 2005.
slparker wrote:. I still mooch in during their sales to see what they have- I think their merino on sale is good value (certainly better than icebreaker unless you go to the christchurch airport seconds shop). .
wayno wrote:i think it's also the "sale mentality" they get everything on sale at one shop attracted by "savings" the concept has them fired up and not really thinking about alternatives.
younger people tend to be distracted by a lot of different interests and on average would spend less time thinking about what they should buy and go for the convenience of one store. they dont have or want to spend the time considering options.
possibly younger ones are not thinking as much about the quality and more about the savings
slparker wrote:yeah I was being facetious, iceman, it's actually only $999 for arc'teryx
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 57 guests