mod: guys, we need to be careful to express opinions, but not attack individuals. Everyone has opinions. We don't have to agree. We don't even need to agree to disagree. You can disagree with the opinion (politely) without attacking the person.John Sheridan wrote:I just got this freaking weird IDEA to take a Hatchet and saw on my next trip, am I MAD, do I really need a hatchet and saw.
No you don't "need" a saw.
north-north-west wrote:John Sheridan wrote:I would like to experiment and make a shelter and make some DIY furniture and maybe cut some wood if allowed for a fire, and maybe some other stuff.
'Leave No Trace' is a foreign concept on the mainland, isn't it?

If you are carrying the saw for survival reason - emergency fire - then carrying a lightweight rope saw is probably best. Just don't burn the bush down with your beacon fire! --
it has happened!Edit: The following are general comments - not moderation and not directed at anyone person. My opinion: Camp fires are old school. Passée! Very undesirable in reserves and National Parks. Criminal negligence in Alpine regions. Trees, logs, shrubs and wood are homes and food for bush animals. Look, but don't touch, and definitely don't destroy.
Clearing bush, lighting fires, or any other behaviour in the bush - I think one should use the same measure for sustainability. Ask yourself "what if everyone who comes this way does what I am doing?". If 100 people went that way, and they all cut a tent clearing in the bush, that would be a 200 square meter clearing. Is that sustainable. So why should I be the exception - the one person allowed to do this. If I can do it, why can't the other 99. Multiply your impact, what ever that impact is, by the number of people that walk in the bush, and then decide if your impact is sustainable.