DaveNoble wrote:If you want to get good photos out in the bush then the most important thing by far - is not what camera you have but to actually get out in the bush and then take some photos. I think for most people it does not matter too much what equipment you use but you do need to have an "eye" for what will make a good photo and how to get that photo given the equipment you have.
Dave
Robatman wrote:This year i have started wearing it on my chest in a chest mounted bag and i take more shots. see this thread for ideas. http://bushwalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=8227&hilit=chest+camera
wayno wrote:the bigger the camera the more likely i am to leave it at home a, the smaller the camera, the more likely i am to take it with me....
wayno wrote: once apon a time all i could afford was an instamatic.... that took fuzzy square photos
wayno wrote:if you dont have the money its academic how good they are...
wayno wrote:he he, i can just hear whoever it was who called this "cheap rubbish" whincing....
but it still coems out with a perfectly respectable rating
http://www.dpreview.com/search/?query=d ... ikon_d3100
but hold the phone you can get a canon 1d c for US$6000
wayno wrote:this is a shot with a standard nikon D3100 (aka rubbish) kit
you can see just how bad the quality is
http://www.flickr.com/photos/67659376@N03/
Nuts wrote:ha, a topic full of camera buffs and nobody game to pick apart my pic ( wont bite )
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests