by rucksack » Sat 10 Nov, 2012 1:07 pm
L2obin, unless you are planning to use the compass for walking overseas, you don’t really need a globally-balanced compass, (such as the Suunto M2 or M3 Global, or the Silva/Brunton equivalents - I have a Brunton-made Silva Voyager 8010 global compass with Brunton’s signature yellow base plate, which I quite like). An entry-level base plate compass from Silva or Suunto or Brunton will be fine, (and a lot cheaper too), especially if you are just starting out using a compass when walking.
I have acquired a lot of compasses over the years, (and my oldest is an elderly handed-down air dampened Silva base plate, which still works admirably and is still accurate), but my go-to compass is a 20 years old Silva Expedition 54; it’s a combined sighting and base plate compass with sighting accuracy of 0.5º, but it sells in Australia for around the $200+ mark, so it's a bit of an overkill for a ‘first’ compass. The Silva Expedition series compasses have 1:25,000 and 1:50,000 Romer scales, (which the Suunto’s don’t seem to have - I only have one Suunto, an old GPS Global Plotter and it has no Romer scales, and the M2 and M3’s certainly don’t have them either). The Silva Expedition 54 uses Silva’s larger Type 4 base plate. I use my 54 regularly, as I mostly do off-track walking and often solo. I also carry a Garmin GPS, but I usually only turn it on at night, to check up on my navigation (and not always, when it is very obvious where I am). Mostly, it’s just a map and compass. No batteries needed.
I would be looking at a simpler less expensive 'localised' southern hemisphere compass first up. There are lots of options and they are decidedly cheaper. And, at the end of the day, they work just the same. You could have a look at a Suunto A-30 or a Silva Ranger, neither of which have Romer scales on their base plates, or the Silva Expedition, which does, as it has the same base plate as its more expensive sibling, the Silva Expedition 54.
For me the singular drawback with the global compasses from both Suunto and Silva, aside from their higher cost, is that they don't have Romer scales marked into their base plates. As we walk with maps overlaid with UTM, no Romer scales mean always fiddling around when measuring onto the map. The in-built Romer scales on a good locally-weighted base plate compass such as the Silva Expedition make that task so much easier, not to mention more precise. (My Silva Voyager 8010, which I use when walking in Asia, has no Romer scales, which is one reason why I like it slightly less than my Silva Expedition 54.)
I value Romer scales on a base plate more than I do a separate declination adjustment, (one can always do the calculation or swivel the compass bezel accordingly), or a marked clinometer scale, for that matter. Having said that the Silva Expedition has Romer scales and declination adjustment and a clinometer scale marked.
Just saying. I have no commercial connection to Silva, or Suunto, or Brunton; I am just a humble compass user with a lot of compasses.
rucksack