sthughes wrote:Usually in grams for individual items, but in kilograms (to one decimal point) for the whole pack.
doogs wrote:acidity and a trace of saline.
Nuts wrote:Norts, the pack change is a good start, leves no choice. Lots of 'traditional' items can be much lighter or aren't really needed. In tas 'some' stuff needs to be a bit heavier but not all. When I went thru the WA's last April (iirc) I had 13kg in a 40L(?) One Planet Vertex.. nothing ridiculously light and a few days food left at the end. Iv'e tried to go lighter but its getting pretty retentive and i refuse to bother![]()
I'd say i'm approaching 'Ultralight Nirvana' (tassie wise)
wayno wrote:what time of year were you were on cygnus? that no 3 isnt really a winter bag for cold places
norts wrote:I am pretty happy with where am I with my gear for Tassie walking. I could spend alot of money and get a lighter sleeping bag, and a lighter tent, but my wife would just say to me if you want to carry less weight why not get rid of your belly.
Roger
doogs wrote:blackberry, anise, spices, tobacco, and powdered cocoa
taswegian wrote:I never considered boots a weight to be considered. Wearing boots for work its almost part of the anatomy. My Scarpas don't feel heavy on but I wouldn't like them hanging around my neck all day.
Beatle boots? Am I really showing my age? What ever are they? We'd wear hobnails to primary school! Niblicks to high school.
Must say the new pack designs are nice.
I've still got my original metal framed canvas and leather H frame. It only hangs on a hook. But that's an interest comparison to the one I looked at.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 69 guests