blacksheep wrote:No longer associated with macpac. (trying to figure out what's next...)
Strider wrote:Thanks for the clarification Jeff. Might I ask your role within Macpac, for future reference? It would seem you are much more than just a retail store employee..
Macpac Ltd wrote:Strider wrote:Thanks for the clarification Jeff. Might I ask your role within Macpac, for future reference? It would seem you are much more than just a retail store employee..
Jeff is not employed by Macpac. Jeff works for the council of trade unions and created the facebook page after mistakenly thinking Macpac were doing something which we aren’t. Jeff has written an apology and this matter is now closed as far as we are concerned.
Cheers,
Team Macpac
andrewa wrote:Stider, me thinks blacksheep was a lot more open, transparent, and personal which we all appreciated. I agree that "Macpac Ltd" , whomever/whatever that might be.......might be better to take a similar approach . I presume that most forumites would rather respond to a "person", than a "corporate response".
Yes that's fair from a forum perspective, but Macpac are doing themselves no favours by engaging with their customer base in this way.Nuts wrote:I'd like to know who is posting on macpac's behalf but meh, none of my business (and probably a smart move)
Anyhow... here, the only forum 'rule' is that they should state their affiliation, nothing more. That's rule enough?
nuts
Giddy_up wrote:Promulgation of false information is dangerous ground to be dabbling in!!!!!!!
Giddy_up wrote:Promulgation of false information is dangerous ground to be dabbling in!!!!!!!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests