scavenger wrote:Does anyone here not have spinal problems?
Brett wrote:The only real downside is the use of artificial waterproof material that once pricked does not seal up like canvas. More a Tasmanian issue but scoparia's fine sharp leaves makes short work of most water proof material as a Gore-tex coat can look unscathed but have thousands of small holes that allow water in.
Devon Annie wrote:Interesting conversation, I'm a small sized woman - 5' nothing so I like to carry not too much, but having a small pack means not being able to carry everything I need for overnight. I like the idea of the Aarn packs, but does anyone know where they can be tried out and bought in Tassie?
Penguin wrote:
I think that there is a confusion between small and light.
P
Brett wrote:Hi Michael
Thanks for the information. Looks quite a good idea especially with a camera stored in the front pack being a real boon. The only real downside is the use of artificial waterproof material that once pricked does not seal up like canvas. More a Tasmanian issue but scoparia's fine sharp leaves makes short work of most water proof material as a Gore-tex coat can look unscathed but have thousands of small holes that allow water in. Assuming you are not paying a premium in weight or cost then no problems as nylon is tough enough.
Though I have enough packs for a person looking at packs with a back issue this is a good looking option especially as it might hide the gut![]()
Cheers Brett
the_camera_poser wrote:Macpac and Lowe- rejected as being too expensive. She's a worse Scrooge than me, I fear.... But we will look into them if she doesn't like the Wilderness Equipment Outbreak or Tatonka Yukon Light on second examination. REJECTED DUE TO SCROOGINESS
tasadam wrote:the_camera_poser wrote:Macpac and Lowe- rejected as being too expensive. She's a worse Scrooge than me, I fear.... But we will look into them if she doesn't like the Wilderness Equipment Outbreak or Tatonka Yukon Light on second examination. REJECTED DUE TO SCROOGINESS
There are sales to be taken advantage of.
My wife is just over 5 feet tall and uses the Macpac Esprit, it suits her well. Don't know whether this info comes too late, but you might want to see what you really can get one for.
If you walked into a shop around here you probably saw an inflated price.
the_camera_poser wrote: I suppose packs are the same.
tasadam wrote:the_camera_poser wrote: I suppose packs are the same.
To an extent. Like most things there is a point of diminishing return.
Having said that, my new Macpac Cascade is nowhere near the quality of my 20 year old Macpac Ravine. Partly due to the design. I'll elaborate some time.
blacksheep wrote:If you have any quality concerns with a Macpac product PLEASE discuss with your local macpac store, or call the toll free number fo customer support. I am satisfied with the quality that I see in our range being equal to any- if you got a product with an issue I assure you Macpac tries to resolve it if we can.
and as for comments on pricing...I beieve where our pricing sits represent tremendous value. How many brands have products that stay in the field as long as a Macpac? (ps- and there is a sale on now)
Brett wrote:blacksheep wrote:If you have any quality concerns with a Macpac product PLEASE discuss with your local macpac store, or call the toll free number fo customer support. I am satisfied with the quality that I see in our range being equal to any- if you got a product with an issue I assure you Macpac tries to resolve it if we can.
and as for comments on pricing...I beieve where our pricing sits represent tremendous value. How many brands have products that stay in the field as long as a Macpac? (ps- and there is a sale on now)
Um? Ok you opened the door. I have a MacPac Traverse 75 litre pack that has written on it Quantum Air Harness and a nice leaflet that says this (Quantum harness) is the premium MacPac harness capable of loads in excess of 20 kilograms. The leaflet also covers the Dynamic Harness that is rated for loads up to 20 kilograms. In a store on last weekend I found the the same pack with the label Dynamic Harness so what harness does my pack have. Yeap it has the Dynamic harness not the Quantum harness. Also first trip out the buckle failed going down Hanson's Peak almost launching me down the fast way.
Wrote to MacPac and after many emails later was told a few things. Yes the buckle was faulty (I had already replaced it with a Burgenhas one), and MacPac could put any label on their pack, and yes it was recognised as being confusing so was changed but that's my problem not MacPac's. Yes the pack is labelled MacPac and reflects on MacPac regardless on who and when this rather confusing labelling was adopted.
Is this enough concern over quality?
Cheers Brett
tasadam wrote:blacksheep wrote:If you have any quality concerns with a Macpac product PLEASE discuss with your local macpac store, or call the toll free number fo customer support. I am satisfied with the quality that I see in our range being equal to any- if you got a product with an issue I assure you Macpac tries to resolve it if we can.
and as for comments on pricing...I beieve where our pricing sits represent tremendous value. How many brands have products that stay in the field as long as a Macpac? (ps- and there is a sale on now)
I did. They couldn't do anything as they saw the damage as wear, despite the age and despite the old pack put up with worse abuse for 20 years. They said it wasn't covered (fair enough) and recommended a local repairer. I took it there. They fixed up similar problems in the Esprit which was 4 years old, but this Cascade they could not fix.
However this is not the topic to discuss that so I might split this off to a new topic when I have time to elaborate on my problem.
Thanks for asking though - I had considered PM'ing you.
the_camera_poser wrote:I'd worry about there being no padding in that,
Brett wrote:Hi
I have been toying with the idea of using a stubby holder to protect the lenses but not yet tried the idea. It is surprising that nobody makes waterproof camera bags or probably more likely nobody locally stocks them. After the last walk on Sunday I brought a camera snout bag and found that the camera and a light weight waterproof bag would just fit in with a compact lenses and just fit on the pack belt. Time will see if it works or just annoy the living daylights out off me.
Back on packs, Allgoods Launceston did have one Aarn pack in stock but was a day pack with front balance pockets. Um? Yes it did only weight 750 grams and was 33 litres but looked a little tricky to set-up and flimsy but then again like anything new there will be buyer resistance.
Cheers Brett
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 71 guests