by Walk_fat boy_walk » Thu 19 Feb, 2015 12:51 pm
Assuming that this question is asked on the basis that you've down the Routeburn/Greenstone? If that's the case, and all other things being equal (taking into account the impact that different weather/seasons can have on the experience), if you can do the RB/Greenstone, you can do the OLT. Both are well maintained and easy to follow. Both are subject to all kinds of weather (from sublime to foul/dangerous). Both have options of camping and huts (and both have a huts ranging from basic to "chalets").
Main differences are:
- Most of the best OLT features are on sidetrips, which differs from the RB/Greenstone (with the exceptions of Conical Hill and Key Summit). If anything I'd say the grade of parts of some of the sidetrips on the OLT are more difficult than anything on the RB/Greenstone, but not dramatically so.
- OLT huts don't have in-hut running water, gas cookers, flushing toilets, electric lighting, mattress etc... very much first world problems but it means you'll need to remember to take fuel stove and sleeping mat.
- OLT probably gets muddier after sustained rain, but again it is, in general, well maintained and any differences would be marginal
- In terms of climbing/descending, both have their 'ups and downs', but the OLT has more of them (particularly if doing the side trips, which you really should if weather permits)
- In NZ, if 'hutting', you're generally not expected to carry a tent. On the OLT, carry a tent even if using the huts. The huts can be full, you really should have an emergency shelter, and in any case, there are a range of alternative campsites away from the huts that are worth exploring if you want to avoid crowds.
The upshot is that if you found the NZ walk OK, you should be OK with the OLT.