aloftas wrote:More Latin here than a Gladiators event, and more distress than a Grecan drama.
On Forestry, "per se"...
If ONLY we could have a system which was selective, which was minimal impact, coupled with a well thought out fire plan...
if only...
years ago, things were probably harder...but probably better.
We need FT to keep these roads open....literally...
meaning, that if FT folds as mooted...who actually is going to manage the forests and roads, fire breaks?
Forestry and tourism must walk together.
We need a balance a workable forestry model, along side and in conjunction with a workable tourism model. ie. this is how we manage our forests, so you tourists are able to use the wilderness which is locked up...via the forestry roads..
I think, unless you want to live in a vegan yurt, it is g=hypocritical to denigrate the role of forestry.
Must, however be coupled with conservation ethos.
Man...what a jaded argument....all my life, the conservation ethos pitted against the values of agriculture, mining and forestry...
we need it all...
Unrtunately, vested interests create situations where outcomes are predetermined and steps taken to elicit those desired outcomes.
"Consensus Programming"
Like a coin operated amusement game.
Your coin, their amusement.
A bit like moderation in schools.
A pathetic, abject and pi poor result in lamentable literacy and atrocious history,implausible physics and gen "why?!" general knowledge...designed to elevate the whole at the expense of those cognisant.
What is it?
Don't parents teach their kids anymore?
Cant blame the teachers, and neither can we blame the mediocre beaurocrats who are doing the bidding of interest groups.
RichB wrote:Yes all this speaking in tongues and drivle is a bit silly and off the topic of what matters..As far as the environmental situation here in Tassie goes...80% of the population in Tasmania couldnt care less about the environment or wildlife that they are blessed with...all you have to do is take a drive around this beautiful island and see the mountains of rubbish on the side of the road..Stop your car at a parking spot on any road, look over the side and see the mountains of dumped rubbish there too, even in some national parks..You cant help but notice the hundreds of dead and injured wildlife splattered all over the road here,some run over on purpose because the bogan sees it as pest, and dont forget the Tasmanian Govt are bogans too...tree cutters,environmental vandals maybe worse than some 3rd world countries..Yes i love Tassie, its so beautiful, we just have a huge amount of bogan trogs here that dont feel the same..and when you hear the old saying that Tasmania has 2 headed folk..Just take a walk around Burnie on a day time..
Hallu wrote:Sad to see that Corvus and Nuts always move to personal attacks and destroy all discussion.
vicrev wrote:More like people outside Tassie don't care about issues there
Taurë-rana wrote:I think the reason that people here believe that it is ok to log is 1 because there are no jobs here and they think logging provides jobs, and 2 because they believe that there is still lots of native forest left in Tassie. Lies heard enough times eventually get believed, as we are seeing with the Abbott government's increasing success with convincing the population about the danger of terrorism, asylum seekers and the budget deficit.
When you are trying to live on very little money, becoming totally demoralised about ever getting a job, it's easy to blame someone and greens are the obvious scapegoat. Yes, there are lots of bogans here, but there are lots of apathetic, selfish, uncaring high income earners who don't think they are bogans elsewhere who are just as bad for the planet if not worse because they consume more.
And for anyone who believes Forestry Tas, or believe that what they do is good for the state, you obviously haven't listened to their lies, and watched their business practices and destruction for as long as I have. We have a little bit left of something that is getting rarer and rarer on the planet, and they want to chop it down? They've been putting in plantations for so many years and saying it's sustainable, why are they still targeting old growth forests? I wouldn't believe in no logging if we had managed our forests sustainably but we haven't and we have run out of old forests that are 'spare'. We can't just keep cutting them down, they are not replaceable.
north-north-west wrote:Taurë-rana wrote:I think the reason that people here believe that it is ok to log is 1 because there are no jobs here and they think logging provides jobs, and 2 because they believe that there is still lots of native forest left in Tassie. Lies heard enough times eventually get believed, as we are seeing with the Abbott government's increasing success with convincing the population about the danger of terrorism, asylum seekers and the budget deficit.
When you are trying to live on very little money, becoming totally demoralised about ever getting a job, it's easy to blame someone and greens are the obvious scapegoat. Yes, there are lots of bogans here, but there are lots of apathetic, selfish, uncaring high income earners who don't think they are bogans elsewhere who are just as bad for the planet if not worse because they consume more.
And for anyone who believes Forestry Tas, or believe that what they do is good for the state, you obviously haven't listened to their lies, and watched their business practices and destruction for as long as I have. We have a little bit left of something that is getting rarer and rarer on the planet, and they want to chop it down? They've been putting in plantations for so many years and saying it's sustainable, why are they still targeting old growth forests? I wouldn't believe in no logging if we had managed our forests sustainably but we haven't and we have run out of old forests that are 'spare'. We can't just keep cutting them down, they are not replaceable.
Wish there was an applause emoticon.
Well said, TR.
Nuts wrote:hmmm, argh, it's not hard with you bagel breath, you hardly seem to bother reading! where? no?, second thoughts, yes, don't bother!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests