Kickinghorse wrote:to boot!
Kickinghorse wrote:Roger C swears by KT 26’s a man with that much walking experience can’t be wrong. They are still out there and good.
Phil
Zapruda wrote:Kickinghorse wrote:Roger C swears by KT 26’s a man with that much walking experience can’t be wrong. They are still out there and good.
Phil
Quite a few of us still wear them. Can’t complain for $40
gayet wrote:Surely by relying on boots to provide ankle 'support', all you do is end up with weak, sloppy ankles when you take the boots off!!
peregrinator wrote:Zapruda wrote:Kickinghorse wrote:Roger C swears by KT 26’s a man with that much walking experience can’t be wrong. They are still out there and good.
Phil
Quite a few of us still wear them. Can’t complain for $40
What their average life expectancy for bushwalking?
FatCanyoner wrote:When I see someone in fancy hiking boots, it actually makes me nervous about their experience. To me, hiking boots usually suggest a person walks on tracks and has limited off-track experience.
Dexter wrote: I just think goretex in shoes is a bit of a marketing ploy. They are heavier and hotter, and as mentioned a fair bit on here... Don't dry if they do get wet.
Lamont wrote:So are you after some MD?
Penguin wrote:It is re raising from an old thread but is there any robust evidence that boots actually protect you from damage to the ligaments in your ankles? Certainly protect your ankles against grazes but what about actual ankle support. Lots of anecdotes out there but I have not seen any solid evidence. Last lit surgery I did was about six or seven years ago, which was massively inconclusive.
Dexter wrote:I just checked out some KT26's today. A serious bargain if they work for you, but too wide and flat for my feet.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests