Tasmania specific bushwalking discussion.
Forum rules
Tasmania specific bushwalking discussion. Please avoid publishing details of access to sensitive areas with no tracks.
Sat 24 May, 2008 8:17 pm
The missus was keen to go for a walk today. It doesn't normally happen, so I wasn't going to turn it down and picked a walk I haven't done that I thought would be suitable for her (ie. not too steep). We set out along the Western Creek track, just to see what's up that way and if it'd be a good alternative approach to get to nameless hut.
Before I start jabbering about the walk, there's a few pics
here.
The track is pretty good, it's reasonably long but because it heads up through a gully in the tiers it's not very steep. It took us about 5hrs return to Whiteleys Hut, but it should be doable in less than that. The track passes a really nice
waterfall, which I think needs a name. Then it heads up onto the plateau (although it doesn't look like it at times) and pops out at "Norm Whiteleys Shack", a rustic tin hut with views across to Mt. Ironstone (that trigpoint was calling me, but we just didn't have time dammit). We met some walkers near the hut who told me that Whiteleys hut was the best on the tiers in terms of shelter from nasty cold weather. I imagine that'd be true too, because it's not very big and the celing is low, so it's woodheater (and there's plent of wood available) would heat it really well. Incidentally, these guys had come up via Syds track, and told me that the track looked like it'd been cleared sometime recently (how much I don't know) and was the easiest way up onto that section of the tiers. Nice chaps too. Probably should've told them about the forums (left the address in the visitors book at the hut though).
All in all a worthwhile trip. One thing though. We nearly missed the river crossing where Western Creek track crosses the creek itself. If the track seems to have stopped and you've made it as far as an old fence (WT *$&#?) and a scree field you've gone too far, go back and cross the river, there's an orange marker on a tree on your side and the track continues at a
cairn on the other side of the river.
L8r.
Last edited by
Speculator on Sun 17 Apr, 2011 8:29 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Sun 25 May, 2008 2:02 pm
Ah, so that's what that joint is called!
I was up on Ironstone weekend before last, and noticed what looked like a hut (not marked on the map) with a visible track heading down into the gully. I considered dropping down off Ironstone and scrub bashing my way down there as an alternate way home but the fading light was not on my side, so i played it safe and headed back to the car via Higgs Track.
Sounds like it could be the makings of a nice little circuit though; Higgs track - Mt Ironstone - Western Ck Track could be done in a reasonable day if you kept the pace up on the off-track sections. If, as you say, Western Ck track isn't too steep that'd be a bonus - Higgs Track isn't much fun on the way down. Chalk that on onto the to-do, maybe when a bit of the white stuff is around.
Last edited by
tim on Sun 25 May, 2008 5:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Sun 25 May, 2008 4:52 pm
Hi
Nice read Speculator ... I have no idea of the area you are talking about

Any chance of a google plot
Stuart
Sun 25 May, 2008 6:33 pm
prickle wrote:Hi
Nice read Speculator ... I have no idea of the area you are talking about

Any chance of a google plot
Stuart
Handy that I had the GPS turned on for the walk eh? Here's a kml file:
of the last trackpoint on our walk, which is where we turned around at Whiteleys Hut (or
Norm Whiteleys Shack). Google Earth shows the Western Creek Track leading up to it.
L8r.
Last edited by
Speculator on Sun 17 Apr, 2011 8:28 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Sun 25 May, 2008 6:45 pm
Speculator wrote: Handy that I had the GPS turned on for the walk eh?
L8r.
Thanks for that Speculator
Stuart
Sun 25 May, 2008 6:59 pm
Here's a screenshot from Google Earth:

You can see thate gully you walk through quite clearly when you drive past the tiers.
Last edited by
Speculator on Sun 17 Apr, 2011 8:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Mon 26 May, 2008 11:24 am
Hi Speculator, Good info can you tell me how to open the KML file in Google Earth please? Just glancing at your Earth map suggests to me that you went up on the original track, that is following the wooden sign along a pretty level track for a fair way before it turns up the gully. There is a shorter[better?] way behind the car park. This is dry all the way up.
Cheers
pompom
Mon 26 May, 2008 11:51 am
Hi Pompom
If you click on the Google link it should download to your computer ... then click on the file and it should launch Google earth and the file will load ... Well that's what I did
Stuart
Mon 26 May, 2008 12:01 pm
Hi Stuart, I clicked on the little green KTM file link and got a lot of code with no xtion to Earth.
Can anybody help?
Mon 26 May, 2008 12:02 pm
Pompom wrote:Hi Speculator, Good info can you tell me how to open the KML file in Google Earth please? Just glancing at your Earth map suggests to me that you went up on the original track, that is following the wooden sign along a pretty level track for a fair way before it turns up the gully. There is a shorter[better?] way behind the car park. This is dry all the way up.
Cheers
pompom
You may need to right-click the link and select
Save Target As or
Save link As. It'll then download a file to your computer, if you find that file and open it, it should launch Google Earth.
L8r.
Mon 26 May, 2008 12:32 pm
Hi, No go. I've tried everything that you suggest, plus I sent it to desktop and tried dragging it into Earth, rClick and open with, changed that to Earth,nogo. Still just get code?????
Mon 26 May, 2008 1:55 pm
Hmm you are right Pompom
To get it to workclick on the link in Speculators post ... you will get a page of code in your browser
Go to "Save As" it should come up as Whiteleys Hut ... if it add ".kml" and then save to your desktop ... it "should" look like a Google earth KML file

Then double click on it and Bob

will be your uncle (and your name as well I believe)
Stuart
Otherwise send me an email
scthorn@gmail.com and I'll send it as an attachment PS the file will only locate Whiteleys Hut it does include the track
Mon 26 May, 2008 2:05 pm
It worked for me, Bob. How current is your version of Google Earth (click on Help & Check for Updates Online)?
Mon 26 May, 2008 2:32 pm
supposed to be the latest Barry, I'll check the suggestion above before contemplating suicide.
Mon 26 May, 2008 2:44 pm
Got it just as Prickle said ,his blood's worth bottling. The file went to the desk top as did t'other but with a different icon,it then opened beautifully.
Funny I knew the hut as Lees Hut, is the log book still there with all Pennies adventures? if the weather was crook you could always fill in an hour or two reading her entries.
Speculator must have legs like tree trunks because I'm damned if I find the climb easy. Kerry How told me of how he suffered carrying the stove up there years ago.
I once had grandiose ideas of starting the walk at the Syd's Track start then contouring across the tiers to meet up with the upper part of the Westerns[Westons] Track just beneath the rock face.
Sat 31 May, 2008 2:15 pm
I can't find Whiteleys Hut marked on either Lake Mackenzie 1:25,000 or Mersey 1:100,000?
Could someone give me the co-ordinates please.
Sat 31 May, 2008 8:00 pm
For co-ordinates go back to Speculator's post showing google earth and find them on the bottom left
FF
Sat 31 May, 2008 10:55 pm
kanangra wrote:I can't find Whiteleys Hut marked on either Lake Mackenzie 1:25,000 or Mersey 1:100,000?
Could someone give me the co-ordinates please.
Yeah, it's like it doesn't exist. Here's the coords:
S41 42.1250 E146 27.8747
L8r.
Wed 04 Jun, 2008 2:14 pm
Any chance of map co-ords rather than lat and long?
Wed 04 Jun, 2008 7:32 pm
Grab the spreadsheet from here - very useful for conversions
http://www.ga.gov.au/geodesy/datums/calcs.jsp#coords
Wed 04 Jun, 2008 7:48 pm
kanangra wrote:Any chance of map co-ords rather than lat and long?
If you are entering it into Goolge Earth, just cut and paste Speculators co-ords as written onto the "Fly to" search and press enter.
Last edited by
walkinTas on Wed 04 Jun, 2008 7:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Wed 04 Jun, 2008 7:51 pm
Here they are in GDA94
455451.3 E
5383161.8 S
Thu 05 Jun, 2008 9:37 am
Thank you. That's what I needeed the low tech solution.
Thu 05 Jun, 2008 12:45 pm
tastrax wrote:Here they are in GDA94
455451.3 E
5383161.8 S
Hi Tastrax quoted the above however I believe that GDA94 is only relevant if the mapis printed to that datum. Most of the maps in present use have a datum of GDA66. The relevant datum is found on all Tasmaps in the legend at the foot of the map. I understand that the GDA94 datum is used on the latest map print and these are fairly rare[I think}. I'm not sure how much the difference would translate onto the map but I'm pretty sure that accuracy would suffer. I am open to correction because I have only owned a GPS for a few months and my studies of them is somewhat limited.Maybe a more GPS literate forumite would like to jump in.
I've just had a squizz at the coordinates on the map and it looks to be about 11/2 K's out on accuracy.
Sat 07 Jun, 2008 1:23 pm
Pompom wrote:I've just had a squizz at the coordinates on the map and it looks to be about 11/2 K's out on accuracy.
Not quite correct. A point in GDA94 is approx. 214m NNE of the same point in AGD66.
You may also be able to easily convert GDA co-ordinates into AGD co-ords using your GPS.
Here are the co-ords in AGD66 converted from tastrax's GDA co-ords
455339 E
5382980 S
Hingrock
Sat 07 Jun, 2008 6:12 pm
If you don't have a GPS and want a quick conversion, try this tool -
Convert Coordinates.
Sun 22 Jun, 2008 12:14 pm
Hingrock wrote:Pompom wrote:I've just had a squizz at the coordinates on the map and it looks to be about 11/2 K's out on accuracy.
Not quite correct. A point in GDA94 is approx. 214m NNE of the same point in AGD66.
You may also be able to easily convert GDA co-ordinates into AGD co-ords using your GPS.
Here are the co-ords in AGD66 converted from tastrax's GDA co-ords
455339 E
5382980 S
Hingrock
I believe it is the other way around when talking about GDA 94 and AGD 66.
A point in AGD 66 is 214M NNE of a point in GDA 94.
That is why you add to GDA 94 when making the conversion.
Incidentally, adding 1to the Easting and 2 to the Northing on a 6 figure reference is pretty accurate.
Hope this helps.
Mon 23 Jun, 2008 10:35 pm
mag3000 wrote:Hingrock wrote:Pompom wrote:I've just had a squizz at the coordinates on the map and it looks to be about 11/2 K's out on accuracy.
Not quite correct. A point in GDA94 is approx. 214m NNE of the same point in AGD66.
You may also be able to easily convert GDA co-ordinates into AGD co-ords using your GPS.
Here are the co-ords in AGD66 converted from tastrax's GDA co-ords
455339 E
5382980 S
Hingrock
I believe it is the other way around when talking about GDA 94 and AGD 66.
A point in AGD 66 is 214M NNE of a point in GDA 94.
That is why you add to GDA 94 when making the conversion.
Incidentally, adding 1to the Easting and 2 to the Northing on a 6 figure reference is pretty accurate.
Hope this helps.
Not quite correct.
Here is the GDA grid (red) overlayed over the AGD grid (black)
Tue 24 Jun, 2008 9:00 pm
kanangra wrote:Thank you. That's what I needeed the low tech solution.
I thought the low tech solution was to follow the piece of string...
Tue 08 Jul, 2008 10:18 pm
I just had a look at both my grid layers and mine are shown as the opposite to yours.
The green is GDA 94 and the black is AGD66 in my image
- Attachments
-

© Bushwalk Australia and contributors 2007-2013.