Infernal devices
Navigation on Track
Text and photosTerry Cornall
Infernal devices
I do like a nice GPS receiver with displayable map. I also despise having to recharge them all the time. I spend a bit of time now and then working on a design for an e-paper based device with a 7" screen.
54 | Bushwalk October 2024
"
I want a highly selectable level of detail using editable Open Street Maps and have it programmed in Circuit Python.
I want a highly selectable level of detail using editable Open Street Maps (JSON versions) and have it programmed in Circuit Python (or even better Python). It needs a low-power GPS receiver module that has non-volatile memory and a low-power 'sleep' mode and selectable intervals all on a low-power host with uA 'deep sleep' so that I can tweak the software to perform as I want it to. Meanwhile, until that pipe-dream comes to fruition, I have a bevvy of off-the-shelf models to choose from. I knew I'd take my Fenix 5x watch because it is light, has maps, would have a GPX track downloaded to it to follow, would warn me (somewhat) when I got off-track, is rugged, waterproof and easily looked at etc. Supposed to be able to do normal Navstar-only GPS tracking for 12 hours with second-by-second sampling rate and even longer at 25 hours using a slow-sampling Ultratrac mode but the positioning accuracy that Ultratrac gives is rubbish and I don't use it. Besides, measurements I've made convinced me it doesn't actually make much
difference to battery life. But I only got about 6 or 7 hours at the most. This disappointed me as previous trials did get about 12 hours. Maybe the battery is losing potency... (Hmm, the Fenix 7 has just been released... Much longer battery life...) (After burning out the USB port on the Fenix 5 on this trip I got a Fenix 7x Solar. It has great battery life, 80 hours using GPS at 1 s interval or 20 days if using the Expedition mode and gps at 15 min intervals...).
I also wanted to take my Garmin InReach Explorer+ satellite communications messenger, which also has a GPS map mode. This is my goto device in case of disaster and
Gordon checking maps: I knew we shoulda turned left at Albuquerque
55
"
I also carried a GPS-equipped PLB but that doesn't need recharging and you can't get the positioning info out of it. That's just for the cavalry.
has an SOS button that can call in the cavalry. It also lets me stay in touch with home via text when I am not in cellphone network covered areas, which was most of the time. It even allows me to share my trip via a website, on the fly!
The Pixel 5 smartphone I usually carry was also a must, for photos if nothing else, but it also can run the Garmin Explore App that does a decent job of letting me plan and carry out a route, even update the routes on the Fenix if I can stand the multiple tries and uncertain success involved in synching the two. It does have its other quirks too (like hiding the positions of huts until you zoom right into almost the highest res, which means that you have to know where the hut is in order to find it... Why, why, why? Is it
the TopoActive map, or the fault of the app developers? Scathing queries have been sent!) I was worried about battery life on the Pixel. However with Extreme Battery Saver on and Airplane mode on and WIFI and Bluetooth off, it gave VERY good results. Only went down about 5% in 8 hours. Being left on whilst I hiked meant I didn't have to wait minutes for startup and satellite acquisition. Used the power button (there's a setting for that) to open the photo app and it was ready in seconds instead of tens of seconds. This is important because if there is a long delay before the camera is ready the subject (unless it was scenery) usually scurried off into the undergrowth (including Gordon who was patiently indulgent most of the time, nonetheless I didn't want to stretch his good will).
I also carried a GPS-equipped PLB but that doesn't need recharging and you can't get the positioning info out of it. That's just for the cavalry.
Gordon carried a phone with the OsmAnd app and OSM maps, and that gave us one more way to not get lost. Or to get us unlost when we did.
All these GPS things, in conjunction with the printed track notes and maps in a waterproof bag that Gordon carried were useful to help us in navigation and wayfinding. The only time we got a little bit lost was completely our fault for daydreaming. Diversity was key here. Where one device, say the Explore App on the phone, was lacking in detail, say the name of a track or the position of a hut (Grrr) then one of the watch or InReach or OsmAnd or printed notes probably had the missing info. Proved very useful to have so many alternatives. Of course you can go overboard. Perhaps you think that the InReach satellite messenger with SOS button AND the PLB weren't BOTH needed? Let me ask you that question again after you are faced with the situation of having been bitten by a snake whose venom will kill you in a few hours if you aren't very careful about not moving. And you are in a remote ravine with limited access to satellites for the satellite messenger and the cellphone naturally can't see a network because you are too far from towers. In that case, I want all
Must be a very small hut. I had to zoom all the way in to see it
56 | Bushwalk October 2024
the resources possible to reach out for help. InReach appears to be very good, but having the PLB backup at the cost of 250 grams was worth it to me. At least I left my Garmin Dakota 20 handheld behind, lovely little thing that it is, it's made redundant by the Fenix watch.
We're da Hekawe: Navigation and pathfinding
According to the writings of the legendary Korean military scholar General Soon Sing Song, she says, "Navigation is the art of knowing where you are, knowing where your destination is and then the path needed, according to the roads, the terrain, the weather and the deployment of the enemy, of getting from one to the other. Pathfinding, however, is the art of knowing which rock to stand on next". In our case the enemy was the blackberries and trackless bush. The weather didn't really play a part in navigation but in cases of flooding or high winds or lightning, it would have been best to avoid low and high grounds. Terrain is always important. Best to avoid steep bits if possible. Mostly we chose to use tracks and roads as advised by Chapman's notes, but sometimes we chose to use alternatives that would bypass choked gullies, ridges made difficult by regrowth, or just plain boring bits. 'Interesting' bits were treated with caution too...
A map and compass can go a long way to help with the navigation, i.e. the strategy, and certainly having a compass bearing helps to guide the pathfinding, i.e. the tactics needed to carry out the navigation plan.
All of this does require you to know where you started from and where you actually are at a given time. Skilled users of map and compass can, with keen observation of the landscape (and sometimes signposts) get a long way in working their position out. However, a GPS receiver with a map (or the ability to give map coordinates that can be referred to a paper map) is a great boon to the modern traveler in the bush. Used properly, the GPS can tell you where you are with great accuracy and guide you in both the navigation and pathfinding. We relied on the maps and notes for working out how to get from A to B and the GPS receivers to make sure we stayed (when sensible) on
our planned path and to anticipate turnoffs. We also used our discretion to re-plan the path on the fly if it proved to be infeasible due to lost path, blackberries or thick scrub. Mostly we were following an obvious path like a road or a bush track or a river and that made pathfinding pretty easy, but now and then the path was inscrutable and we just had to pursue a general heading or follow terrain features like ridges or rivers. It wasn't hard but it did take some thought. It really helps too if
Stay on target...
57
all parties in the hike participate in pathfinding especially when the lead hiker is focused on the path immediately ahead and the second or later hiker can look around a bit more. Also it is easy to miss a turn in a vague bush path so when the lead hiker finds that the path has disappeared, the people behind might actually have a better view of where it has gone, or at least of a clear spot in the bush that would make progress easier than that horrible tangle that the path has apparently led us to. Gordon was great at spotting turnoffs and track-marking triangles and bits of pink tape that I completely missed when out in front. We did not rely on the triangles however. They were too sparse and too easy to miss, but they were a welcome confirmation when encountered. As for the pink, green (!) or blue tape we came across, all that they really meant is: 'Someone else has been here and they might have been just as lost as you are.' Welcome them but don't trust them too much.
Now you might take exception to the number of GPS devices (4 including the phones), maps (5 including printed ones) and compasses (2, one of which actually failed on us!) that we carried on this trip (detailed in the Infernal devices section at the start of the article) but to underline the importance of redundancy, I just finished watching a YouTube video about an experienced solo hiker in Tasmania who had to call in the rescue chopper because he lost his only navigation device, his phone. It was in thick bush, on a foggy day and he couldn't see the sun well enough to know North from anywhere. No compass, no paper maps, no backup GPS and his only recourse was his PLB. (He went back and did that track again, armed with satellite messenger and GPS and compass and printed map as well as his phone the second time).
Used without proper knowledge and caution however, the GPS device and its maps and marked courses can also mislead you with great accuracy too. Some problems we encountered were:
GPS device wouldn't lock onto satellites and give a position, for a while. This usually occurs when in a ravine or when it is misty or rainy. Just be patient.
GPS device (actually the electronic compass within it, not the GPS receiver) pointed in the wrong direction. Especially in smartphones, the electronic compass used to work out which direction it is pointing when not moving needs to be calibrated, which involves waving the device around in a funny figure of 8. Unfortunately if you aren't aware of the possibility of it being needed, the compass can quite easily mislead you. You also get a bearing from the GPS signal and that requires you to be moving - so if you see a conflict between the direction you are facing when still and the same direction when you are moving, your electronic compass needs a calibration.
Gordon's magnetic compass permanently decided to point South instead of North. Still wondering about that! Is it even possible? Apparently. See Reverse Polarity in Compasses - Glenmore Lodge.
Fenix watch didn't give a strong enough indication of 'off course' and we walked past a turnoff whilst slaying blackberries. It just vibrates 'brrr' once, gives a screen indication and that's it. Doesn't repeat and the 'brrr' is easily missed if your arm is busy working out a cavalry-sabre backhanded slash. People have whinged on the Garmin forum for a long time about being able to customise the indication to get a longer or repeated buzz but so far to no avail. Simply put, pay bloody attention to your pathfinding!
Interpretation of the track notes. Although good, Chapman's notes sometimes needed a bit of cogitation. e.g. instructions like: "Follow the vehicle track.... meet Champion Spur no 5 marked on some
"
Used without proper knowledge and caution however, the GPS device and its maps and marked courses can also mislead you with great accuracy too.
58 | Bushwalk October 2024
maps as CS3. Turn right and follow the vehicle track..." do require some thought. Is the vehicle track we are meant to follow the original one or the new one? Did give us pause, but wasn't hard to get right, especially by referring to the printed maps and various marked courses on various GPS devices.
GPS device said we were off course and urged us to 'go into the woods' but they were gnarly and tangled and monsters lurked therein and we could see a better, clearer way to go, even if there was no beaten path. This happened on the Long Hill course to The Crinoline when the clear path we were following entered a clearing and no obvious exit path could be seen. It was made worse by various bits of pink tape indicating that yes, someone had been here before, but still no real path was obvious. However it was clear to Gordon at least that we should stay out near the 'rim', where it was clearer of scrub and bordered by rocks shielding us from a steep drop off, rather than follow the marked course religiously. This worked, so if it’s possible to do so without messing up the navigation, your pathfinding strategy should be: 'Don't go into the deep dark woods'. In this case it was clear from the maps that following the rim would get us to where we needed to go, and Gordon had a memory from long ago about all this, so we went with his plan and hit the campsite perfectly with minimum bush-bashing. Sometimes the marked course is just wrong, whether because it was entered into the GPS device improperly or too coarsely or because the maps were wrong or because some numpty had decided to make a new path and not enough people had used it because it was silly.
Not on this trip, but a bitter memory from the first GPS device I ever carried (and never again) was that I could NOT find the menu item to navigate back along the route we'd recorded on the way out. This was in bitter cold in the snow with a rapidly draining battery and I wasted (what felt like) half an hour scrolling through
menus and settings. Turns out that that setting was only available if you landed on the navigation actions page from a particular starting point, otherwise it was invisible. Aaaaargh! Nested menus with disappearing options are the WORST idea we software people have ever come up with! Take home message is 'Practise with the GPS before trusting your life to it'. (We made it out alive, BTW)
Maps on some GPS devices not detailed enough. Yeah, like the TopoActive Australia map on my phone used by the Garmin Explore app. Very uncluttered by silly irrelevant details like medium-sized creeks, minor track names, huts etc. Aargh! I was standing right next to Lankey Plains hut and it didn't show on the map at a reasonable level of zoom. When I zoomed right into where I knew it was, suddenly it popped up as a tiny weeny icon and text. How ridiculous! I had to know exactly where it was in order to find it and look at the size of the text and icon compared to the dashed line of the track.
I think we are on track... Let me check the map...
59
Yay! We made it! Now where's that ambulance?
Charge!
All these devices meant I'd need a recharger. About 10,000 mAh ought to do it, though your needs might vary. More charge means heavier charger. For me, 10 Ah was enough to charge everything a couple of times and the Fenix watch every day. I included a spare recharger in the drop-barrel. A cheapie from Jaycar and a slightly more expensive ruggedised one from Decathlon did the job. Plus all the various different cables. Speaking of cables, the Fenix has a 'special' cable to charge it and do you think the bloody thing would stay connected? No, I had to clean the contacts, make sure the springs on each little 'pogo-stick' pin weren't jammed up and then jiggle it around until the watch went 'brrrr' unless the recharger had given up and turned itself off by then, and then very carefully put it down without bumping the cable and disconnecting it. All in the confines of a two man tent. Aaaargh! More scathing messages to manufacturers were drafted whilst I held the cable in place. (I am convinced that all this jiggery-pokery with the charging cable is what burned out the USB port on the watch...).
Gordon's needs were more modest and he put a 7,000 mAh charger in the drop-barrel to recharge his phone and Kindle e-reader at halfway.
Chapman's track notes
McMillans Walking Track is an excellent resource giving good detailed track notes. One thing we noticed though was that we usually took a bit longer to complete a section that the notes suggested. Maybe we took longer breaks, or I was just plain slow. Also, anytime it mentioned 'track may become vague or choked with blackberries' we knew it was going to be a monster. 'Steep short ascent' should be read as 'brutal' and 'challenging' means exactly what it says. 'Interesting' needed to be treated with caution.
This article will continue in the next edition. It was originally a part of a larger article that you can find on Terry’s blog Outdoors OZ.
60 | Bushwalk October 2024