Show all
Browse by Editions Authors Topics Locations

Pack Light, Travel Far

menu_book picture_as_pdf bookTerry Cornall Bushcraft Australia
BWA_December_2024-62

Pack Light, Travel Far

Text and photosTerry Cornall

Ooooh, me back

What backpack to take? Again, purchases in the past gave me some options.

Gordon's pack weighed in at 15kg or less then add water

62 | Bushwalk December 2024


"

The less you buy, the more it costs, when talking about hiking gear.

I needed probably more than 40 and less than 80 litres capacity and wanted lightweight, but comfort is definitely a concern. A good supportive belt and straps are essential and don't forget about ease of access. Belt pockets, water bottle pockets, little clips on the shoulder straps for a GPS device and camera bag are all important. You don't want to have to stop and take off the pack just to access water, or find out where the heck you are, or to take a photo.

In the end, I settled on my ExPed Thunder 70 which weighs in at 1.6kg. I could have taken the even lighter ExPed Lightning 60, but I don't like its rolltop (I like a conventional lid pocket). Or the very light (900g) Impact Leisure 40L, but I didn't trust that 40L would be enough. Or maybe the Kathmandu Vardo 75L, but it is a sturdy pack that weighs in a full kg heavier than the ExPed Thunder. It offers better support though, but I wouldn't really need that for a mere 17kg load (hah!).

The ExPed Thunder is supposed to be weatherproof. Nope, it's not. Just as well, I've learned a thing or two over the decades and put everything in dry bags, or I would have had soggy clothes, sleeping bag, food etc.

Backpack envy

Gordon's Z-Pack fared better in the waterproof stakes and is even lighter than the ExPed Thunder. Not sure what model he has, but I like the look of their Arc Air Robic 60L, even if it doesn't have a conventional pocketed lid. Only 700-ish grams! A full 1 kilo off my already lightweight ExPed! Wow. You can't pay for that... Actually you have to pay for that. The less you buy, the more it costs, when talking about hiking gear.

Next time, I will consider my 900g Impact Leisure 40L pack. It would have been big enough in retrospect, and limited capacity might have dissuaded me from taking too much clothing... And despite its low weight, I bought it at a bargain price of $80 from Anaconda long ago but have never used it much. Never quite trusted it. It seemed too good to be true. Unknown minor brand and

Hmmm, can I call Uber from here? Pack is too heavy

63


"

Don't stint on nourishing food. If it's too heavy, eat faster!

worried that it might be a horror to carry, break a zip or burst a seam in the middle of the hike. The only way to find out is to use the dang thing, so next weekender, it's the one. Actually since then I did try it and wouldn't use it again for more than a day trip. The back length (i.e. the height at which the belt sits) is too short for me and is not adjustable. This is sometimes one of the things they leave out to save weight and cost...

Take a load off

How much weight to carry in total? Food, plus gear, plus clothing, plus water?

I aimed for 17kg with water and managed to do it, but in the end, that was too much. Ditching stuff at midway helped make the second week much more enjoyable. In the future, I'm going to aim for 12kg for a week. Of course a lot depends on your particular physical state. I used to carry 25kg though admittedly, I never found that to be much fun, and I was always rolling an ankle badly at least once per trip. Better, lighter (and more expensive) gear makes it possible to reduce the load, but really, as evidenced by my ruminations above and below, it comes down to what you choose to take (or maybe more importantly, choose to leave behind).

Don't stint on nourishing food. If it's too heavy, eat faster! But don't be stupid about the weight of packaging. We came across someone's lost gear on the path and it contained a glass bottle of rock salt. Not a small bottle either. What on earth were they thinking? And it had no calories! Madness.

Fire!

What about cooking? Basically, heating water was all we needed and not for warmth or anything. Choices for us were gas or shellite, and although better than gas in the cold and snow, shellite wasn't really necessary in this case. It is also slightly heavier and more fiddly. And riskier (says he who once almost burnt down New Federation Hut due to a cracked fuel line). Gordon has a lovely gas stove like this one from FireMaple, Blade 2 Titanium Backpacking Stove, though his is not made from titanium. It has the gas connected to the burner via a hose, which makes it lower, more

Don't stint on nourishing food. If it's too heavy, eat faster!

64 | Bushwalk December 2024


"

Be aware that the 230g is the NETT weight, i.e. just the weight of the gas. The can weighs about 110g empty.

"

Don't do what I have seen some YouTube videoers do and cook inside the tent itself. It's too easy to tip it over and burn a hole in your floor.

stable and easier to keep out of the wind, unlike my Pocket Rocket that sits up on the gas cannister. We took both, for redundancy and because I like to boil up water for coffee in the morning whilst the other burner is busy making porridge.

It's a gas, man

I found a great source of gas at K-Mart where they sell 230g cannisters for $4, which sell for $12 dollars in dedicated camping stores (cough, ripoff). These are Korean made and they worked fine. We worked out that 3 of the 230g cans would do us for the 12 days, with plenty of reserve, so we carried one each and had one in the drop barrel. Previous measurements showed that 1x230g can would do the 2 of us for 5 days, based on about 1.5 litres of boiled water per person per day. I.e. say four 250ml cups of coffee/soup/tea, 1/2 cup for porridge and one cup for freeze-dry meal per person, plus maybe a 1/2 cup per person for dessert. Be aware that the 230g is the NETT weight, i.e. just the weight of the gas. The can weighs about 110g empty. So at about 15g of fuel to boil one liter, you get about 15 boiled liters of water from a cannister. Half or even a third of that if it is constantly windy or cold. Half that again if you are going to be melting snow for water. Altitude throws a spanner in the works, too. Water boils sooner but doesn't get as hot, so food can take longer to cook. Do note that unless it is for reasons of killing pathogens, you may not need to actually boil the water. i.e. for coffee or soup.

I think that we pretty much emptied one can and the other two were probably left about half full each at the end of the trip, so with care (and me drinking less coffee), we could have done it with 2. However, we were not going to give up the hot soup at the end of the day, no way! And I get grumpy if I miss my coffee in the morning…

Put that fire out!

Keep water handy to put out any grass fires your stove might cause. Cook on something less flammable than old dry grass. I used my soggy gaiters spread out on more than one occasion. Cooking in the rain is challenging, and on a couple of nights we cooked under the tent fly in a vestibule. This is where the shellite stoves would have been at a disadvantage as they can easily flare when first lit, but the gas is better behaved. Ensure good ventilation in this case, and be vigilant and wary of things like an unsecured tent flap dropping onto the stove. This almost happened to me when a wet fly, folded back and held just by water tension, suddenly decided to flop down. Sorry Gordon... Also, be careful of spilling the hot water on yourself when cooking, especially in cramped conditions, on uneven ground, or when passing around the hot soup. In case that happens, pour lots of cold water on the burn as soon as possible. Soak it in the creek for 10 minutes if possible. Don't do what I have seen some YouTube videoers do and cook inside the tent itself. It's too easy to tip it over and burn a hole in your floor. Or unthinkingly put down the hot pot and burn a hole in the floor. Be careful of carbon-dioxide and monoxide build up, too. Make sure of your ventilation. This is very important in snow caves, but also in tents.

Campfires? Despise them. They take too much work when I'd rather be sleeping. The only purpose would be to dry stuff out and that means after or during rain, and then it is even harder to start the damn things. Considered it a bit but never used one. I saw plenty of car-campers that appeared to believe that you absolutely had to have a roaring great fire going in the middle of a stinking hot day in order to sit around drinking

65


"

One of my most prized bits of camping gear is a simple water bag I made about 40 years ago.

beer and try to keep cool. And who forgot to put them out properly when they left, in at least one case. And which required chain-sawing the bush around the campsite in order to feed aforementioned conflagrations. Did I say I despised campfires? Maybe I should have been more targeted with my contempt.

Slash and burn

I wondered if I should take a machete? Just for slashing blackberries, not cutting down forests for firewood. The Gerber Gator or Bolo from Anaconda looked good, though way too heavy at 700g to 1kg. Maybe an Imacasa 18 Inch Pata de Cuche (300g!). In the end, I decided not to take one. It would have been useful though. A Jedi light-sabre even more so...

Water

Water is obviously important. You need a lot of it every day. Like 2 or 3 litres per person and even more when it is hot. There is no easy way you can carry enough to meet your needs for multiple days, so you have to resupply frequently. Take some water-purifying tablets, a UV-steriliser, or a good filter (maybe a pump one. I found the squeeze one I tried was much too slow) to prevent infection from dodgy water. Get your water from running sources, well upstream of any campers. And boil, filter, UV-sterilise or add appropriate purifying potions to it if in an area with livestock or ferals like deer, brumbies or pigs. Treat still water (i.e. not running) with even more caution.

One of my most prized bits of camping gear is a simple water bag I made about 40 years ago. The recipe goes like this:

Buy a cheap cardboard cask of wine with a bladder in it. A nice Moscato perhaps, if you like it sweet. 3 or 4 litres ought to do. One with a valve that pops off. This might

be hard to determine at first and some experimentation might be called for.

Drink wine. Check on valve popping off ability. Repeat until successful.

When hangover subsides and you are feeling better, take bladder out of cardboard box and rinse it out.

Get an appropriately sized canvas gear bag, with a drawstring, for the bladder to go into, cut a small hole down the bottom for the valve to poke out of.

Tie a string to the valve cap so that you don't drop it in the creek when filling the bladder. Make sure the hole you put in it for the string doesn't compromise water-tightness, otherwise go back to step one.

Put a handle made from a bit of plastic tubing on the rope of the bag because the thin rope will hurt your hand when carrying the full bag back to camp from hundreds of metres away.

Water bag

66 | Bushwalk December 2024


"

If you can carry it in, you can damn well carry it out. Don't plan to bury it. It only gets dug up by critters.

Toilet paper and rubbish

Do remember to take toilet paper and put some spare in your drop barrel. Also, take some Imodium or similar diarrhoea pills, just in case.

Take a lightweight trowel to dig a pit to bury your crap, well away from water. It might be difficult in stony soil, but do your best, and then pile rocks on it. When we did the AAWT, Gordon and I came across where some car campers had stayed and it was disgusting, with a toilet paper littered gully just behind it.

Despite the fact that their 4x4 was carrying a big shovel and a mattock, they had not even tried to bury their crap at all. Yuk. Be better than that.

Plan to carry out your rubbish, or leave it at the drop barrel at midway for later retrieval. Minimise things beforehand by removing cardboard boxes and so on, and not carrying cans or bottles. If you can carry it in, you can damn well carry it out. Don't plan to bury it. It only gets dug up by critters.

Snakes and spiders and leeches, oh my

Plan for some wildlife. Take and know how to use a snake bandage or two and have a means to call for help if the worst happens. Don't rely on your phone. We saw a total of four deadly red-bellied black snakes, two large but inoffensive goannas, one big water dragon, a huge skink (blue tongue? Probably, but he didn't oblige by poking his tongue out at us) and numerous smaller lizards.

The big 'ol blue-tongue

67


No crocodiles. One great big spider I managed to coax out of her hole in the ground and thousands of small spiders that insisted on building webs across the tracks at just about face level. Ptah!

These spiders are one of the reasons Gordon liked it when I went first down the bush tracks, though he'd often run into my back when I stopped suddenly, waving my sticks madly in front of my face to clear away some overly large arachnid that was aimed at a face to face meeting.

When we went down the track near Lazarini Spur we found great water, but it came at the cost of going into leech city. We pulled quite a number of them off ourselves afterwards. Also, on the Black River section they were lurking in the damp undergrowth, and this time one got me. No photos because, by the time I dealt with it after finding where it had battened onto me and gorged, there was nothing left but a burnt, bloody smear on the rocks. Take that, you parasitic hermaphroditic annelid you. It had its posthumous revenge though, as I write this a week later, I still have an unhealed itchy red welt where it bit me.

Deer were apparently plentiful. We heard bugling in the night and saw lots of footprints. No deer themselves though, except for bits of a dead one I found just upstream after getting water. We didn't use that water and thoroughly pilled the water we did get from even further upstream that night.

This next beastie obviously hadn't heard the oft repeated advice about snakes 'hearing us and crawling away'. I think that is a rubbish statement anyway. I've seen numerous snakes like this that weren't in the least bit inclined to slither off. Maybe if they are out in the open, they stay put as a defensive measure, and maybe it's only the snakes in the grass that slither off. (No, not all of those either, as evidenced by an incident we had on the AAWT a coupla years ago.) Either way, keep your eyes open for them and wear protective shoes/boots and gaiters when walking in the grass and bushes.

This article was originally a part of a larger article that you can find on Terry’s blog Outdoors OZ.

The snake that wouldn't run away

68 | Bushwalk December 2024