GPSGuided wrote:It's out! 24-70mm f1.8-2.8 lens, built-in 3 stops ND filter, built-in EFV, adds 9g in weight.
http://www.dpreview.com/previews/sony-c ... f=features
Ouch... US$799 RRP.
GPSGuided wrote:How do people feel about the 70mm on the long end?
wayno wrote:good price on the original model....
http://www.amazon.com/Sony-DSC-RX100-Se ... B00889ST2G
GPSGuided wrote:It's not a finite resource in a constantly moving tech market place, normal process is inevitable.
Giddy_up wrote:These cameras are not loosing their value because they just take fantastic pictures for the market segment they are in, don't hold your breath for one selling at half price as i don't think it will happen.
Giddy_up wrote:These cameras are not loosing their value because they just take fantastic pictures for the market segment they are in, don't hold your breath for one selling at half price as i don't think it will happen.
RonK wrote:Giddy_up wrote:These cameras are not loosing their value because they just take fantastic pictures for the market segment they are in, don't hold your breath for one selling at half price as i don't think it will happen.
The Mark I was always cheaper than the Mark II (and now mark III) anyway, so the price hasn't really dropped much, but dig around and if willing buy without local warranty and you'll find even lower prices.
Giddy_up wrote:I'll check back in 6 months and see how your oxygen supply is holding out.
Giddy_up wrote:Good comparison wayno, I think I will keep my RX 100 II just the same.
GPSGuided wrote:The common marketing influenced comparison on the lens is not very helpful eg. F2.8 at 70-mm, compared to its predecessor's F4.9 at 100-mm. What the real question is, what is the effective aperture on the old lens at 70mm? It obviously won't be at f2.8, but it's no f4.9 either. f3.5-4 perhaps?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests